• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Meropenem monotherapy versus cefotaxime plus metronidazole combination treatment for serious intra-abdominal infections.

作者信息

Kempf P, Bauernfeind A, Müller A, Blum J

机构信息

Chirurgische Klinik, Stadtkrankenhaus Rüsselsheim, Germany.

出版信息

Infection. 1996 Nov-Dec;24(6):473-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01713053.

DOI:10.1007/BF01713053
PMID:9007598
Abstract

In an open, randomised, multicentre trial, the efficacy and tolerability of empirical meropenem monotherapy (1 g intravenously every 8 hours) and cefotaxime (2 g every 8 hours) plus metronidazole (0.5 g intravenously every 8 hours) for 5 to 10 days was compared in 94 patients with serious intra-abdominal infection who required surgery. Eighty-three patients had an evaluable clinical response. Significantly more patients in the meropenem group had a satisfactory clinical response at the end of treatment (41/43 [95.3%] vs 30/40 [75.0%]; p = 0.008). The bacteriological response was also higher in the meropenem group (31/33 vs 26/32). In the bacteriologically evaluable population, a satisfactory clinical response was observed in 31/33 of those who received meropenem compared to 24/32 of the cefotaxime/metronidazole recipients (p = 0.03). Empirical meropenem monotherapy should prove a useful alternative to the currently standard combination treatment for serious intraabdominal infections.

摘要

相似文献

1
Meropenem monotherapy versus cefotaxime plus metronidazole combination treatment for serious intra-abdominal infections.
Infection. 1996 Nov-Dec;24(6):473-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01713053.
2
Antibiotic monotherapy with meropenem in the surgical management of intra-abdominal infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:179-89. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.179.
3
[Prospective randomized trial of meropenem versus cefotaxime and metronidazole in the treatment of intraabdominal infections].
Med Clin (Barc). 1998 Jun 27;111(3):88-91.
4
Carbapenems: monotherapy in intra-abdominal sepsis.碳青霉烯类药物:用于腹腔内脓毒症的单一疗法。
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995;96:28-33.
5
Cefotaxime and metronidazole in severe intra-abdominal infection.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(1-2):183-8. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(95)00104-i.
6
A multi-centre study to compare meropenem and cefotaxime and metronidazole in the treatment of hospitalized patients with serious infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 May;39(5):631-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/39.5.631.
7
A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing cefepime plus metronidazole with imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Cefepime Intra-abdominal Infection Study Group.一项比较头孢吡肟加甲硝唑与亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的随机双盲临床试验。头孢吡肟腹腔内感染研究组。
Arch Surg. 1997 Dec;132(12):1294-302. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430360040008.
8
Safety and efficacy of meropenem in hospitalised children: randomised comparison with cefotaxime, alone and combined with metronidazole or amikacin. Meropenem Paediatric Study Group.美罗培南在住院儿童中的安全性和有效性:与头孢噻肟单独使用以及与甲硝唑或阿米卡星联合使用的随机对照研究。美罗培南儿科研究组
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:99-108. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.99.
9
Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, phase II trial to assess the safety and efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam plus metronidazole compared with meropenem in adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections.一项多中心、双盲、随机、II期试验,旨在评估头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦联合甲硝唑与美罗培南相比,在患有复杂性腹腔内感染的成年患者中的安全性和有效性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Sep;58(9):5350-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00049-14. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
10
Intravenous meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized patients. Meropenem Serious Infection Study Group.静脉注射美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗住院患者严重细菌感染的比较。美罗培南严重感染研究组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Sep;38(3):523-37. doi: 10.1093/jac/38.3.523.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of different antibiotic injection regimens on patients with severe infections: A meta-analysis.不同抗生素注射方案对重症感染患者的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Jan;21(1):e14514. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14514.
2
Carbapenem Antibiotics Versus Other Antibiotics for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: a Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (PROSPERO CRD42018108854).碳青霉烯类抗生素与其他抗生素治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的患者水平荟萃分析 (PROSPERO CRD42018108854)。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun;27(6):1208-1215. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05651-7. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotic monotherapy with meropenem in the surgical management of intra-abdominal infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:179-89. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.179.
2
Wound and intraabdominal infections: microbiological considerations and approaches to treatment.
Clin Infect Dis. 1993 Jun;16 Suppl 4:S266-72. doi: 10.1093/clinids/16.supplement_4.s266.
3
Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in patients with intra-abdominal infections.美罗培南在腹腔内感染患者中的药代动力学。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Jan;38(1):151-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.1.151.
4
Carbapenems vs β-Lactam Monotherapy or Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
碳青霉烯类药物与β-内酰胺类单药治疗或联合治疗复杂性腹腔内感染:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 9;6(10):ofz394. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz394. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Optimal Treatment for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections in the Era of Antibiotic Resistance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Therapy With Metronidazole.抗生素耐药时代复杂腹腔内感染的最佳治疗:甲硝唑联合治疗疗效与安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 7;3(3):ofw143. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw143. eCollection 2016 Sep.
5
Canadian practice guidelines for surgical intra-abdominal infections.加拿大外科腹腔内感染诊疗指南
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2010 Spring;21(1):11-37. doi: 10.1155/2010/580340.
6
Meropenem: a review of its use in the treatment of serious bacterial infections.美罗培南:其在治疗严重细菌感染中的应用综述
Drugs. 2008;68(6):803-38. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868060-00006.
7
Antibiotic regimens for secondary peritonitis of gastrointestinal origin in adults.成人胃肠道源性继发性腹膜炎的抗生素治疗方案
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD004539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004539.pub2.
8
Meropenem: an updated review of its use in the management of intra-abdominal infections.美罗培南:其在腹腔内感染管理中应用的最新综述
Drugs. 2000 Sep;60(3):619-46. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200060030-00010.
9
Use of newer quinolones for the treatment of intraabdominal infections: focus on clinafloxacin.新型喹诺酮类药物在腹腔内感染治疗中的应用:聚焦于克林沙星
Infection. 1999 May-Jun;27(3):166-72. doi: 10.1007/BF02561522.
10
Monobactams and carbapenems for treatment of intraabdominal infections.用于治疗腹腔内感染的单环β-内酰胺类抗生素和碳青霉烯类抗生素。
Infection. 1999 Mar-Apr;27(2):136-47. doi: 10.1007/BF02560517.
Monotherapy for fever and neutropenia in cancer patients: a randomized comparison of ceftazidime versus imipenem.癌症患者发热伴中性粒细胞减少的单药治疗:头孢他啶与亚胺培南的随机对照比较
J Clin Oncol. 1995 Jan;13(1):165-76. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.1.165.
5
Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jan;35(1):139-48. doi: 10.1093/jac/35.1.139.
6
Carbapenems: monotherapy in intra-abdominal sepsis.碳青霉烯类药物:用于腹腔内脓毒症的单一疗法。
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995;96:28-33.
7
Imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: a review of worldwide experience.
Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Jul-Aug;7 Suppl 3:S518-21. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.supplement_3.s518.
8
Drug therapy. Beta-lactam antibiotics (2).药物治疗。β-内酰胺类抗生素(2)。
N Engl J Med. 1988 Feb 25;318(8):490-500. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198802253180806.
9
In vitro antibacterial activity of SM-7338, a carbapenem antibiotic with stability to dehydropeptidase I.对脱氢肽酶I稳定的碳青霉烯类抗生素SM-7338的体外抗菌活性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Feb;33(2):215-22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.2.215.
10
In-vitro activity of meropenem imipenem, the penem HRE 664 and ceftazidine against clinical isolates from West Germany.美罗培南、亚胺培南、青霉烯类HRE 664及头孢他啶对来自西德临床分离株的体外活性
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Sep;24 Suppl A:73-84. doi: 10.1093/jac/24.suppl_a.73.