• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非双正态ROC数据分析中的重采样技术。

Resampling techniques in the analysis of non-binormal ROC data.

作者信息

Mossman D

机构信息

Division of Forensic Psychiatry, Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, OH 45401-0927, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1995 Oct-Dec;15(4):358-66. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500406.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X9501500406
PMID:8544679
Abstract

The methods most commonly used for analyzing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data incorporate "binormal" assumptions about the latent frequency distributions of test results. Although these assumptions have proved robust to a wide variety of actual frequency distributions, some data sets do not "fit" the binormal model. In such cases, resampling techniques such as the jackknife and the bootstrap provide versatile, distribution-independent, and more appropriate methods for hypothesis testing. This article describes the application of resampling techniques to ROC data for which the binormal assumptions are not appropriate, and suggests that the bootstrap may be especially helpful in determining confidence intervals from small data samples. The widespread availability of ever-faster computers has made resampling methods increasingly accessible and convenient tools for data analysis.

摘要

分析接受者操作特征(ROC)数据时最常用的方法包含了关于测试结果潜在频率分布的“双正态”假设。尽管这些假设已被证明对于各种实际频率分布都具有稳健性,但有些数据集并不“符合”双正态模型。在这种情况下,诸如刀切法和自助法等重采样技术为假设检验提供了通用的、与分布无关且更合适的方法。本文描述了重采样技术在双正态假设不适用的ROC数据中的应用,并表明自助法在从小数据样本确定置信区间时可能特别有用。运算速度越来越快的计算机的广泛普及,使得重采样方法成为越来越容易获取且方便的数据分析工具。

相似文献

1
Resampling techniques in the analysis of non-binormal ROC data.非双正态ROC数据分析中的重采样技术。
Med Decis Making. 1995 Oct-Dec;15(4):358-66. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500406.
2
Goodness-of-fit issues in ROC curve estimation.ROC曲线估计中的拟合优度问题。
Med Decis Making. 1999 Apr-Jun;19(2):193-201. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9901900210.
3
A comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches to ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.定量诊断试验ROC分析的参数法与非参数法比较。
Med Decis Making. 1997 Jan-Mar;17(1):94-102. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9701700111.
4
Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.当拟合的双正态曲线呈现不合适的形状时估计ROC曲线下的面积。
Acad Radiol. 2017 Feb;24(2):209-219. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.020. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
5
Confidence bands for receiver operating characteristic curves.用于接收者操作特征曲线的置信带
Med Decis Making. 1993 Jul-Sep;13(3):191-7. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9301300304.
6
Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.副法线似然比与双卡方ROC曲线模型的等价性。
Stat Med. 2016 May 30;35(12):2031-57. doi: 10.1002/sim.6816. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
7
Minimum-norm estimation for binormal receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.双正态接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线的最小范数估计
Biom J. 2009 Dec;51(6):1030-46. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200900128.
8
Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.连续诊断试验的平滑非参数接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线。
Stat Med. 1997 Oct 15;16(19):2143-56. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19971015)16:19<2143::aid-sim655>3.0.co;2-3.
9
Measurement error and confidence intervals for ROC curves.ROC曲线的测量误差与置信区间
Biom J. 2005 Aug;47(4):409-16. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200310159.
10
The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.“恰当”的副法线模型:使用退化数据进行参数化接收者操作特征曲线估计
Acad Radiol. 1997 May;4(5):380-9. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(97)80121-3.

引用本文的文献

1
On the bias in the AUC variance estimate.关于AUC方差估计中的偏差。
Pattern Recognit Lett. 2024 Feb;178:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2023.12.012. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
2
Measures, Uncertainties, and Significance Test in Operational ROC Analysis.操作特征曲线(ROC)分析中的测量、不确定性与显著性检验
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2011 Feb 1;116(1):517-37. doi: 10.6028/jres.116.003. Print 2011 Jan-Feb.
3
Comparing the Predictive Ability of Prognostic Models in Ischemic Stroke; Derivation, Validation, and Discrimination Beyond the ROC Curve.
比较缺血性卒中预后模型的预测能力;ROC曲线之外的推导、验证和区分
Front Neurol. 2014 Jan 27;5:9. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00009. eCollection 2014.
4
Comparison of standardized clinical classification with fundus photograph grading for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema severity.比较标准化临床分类与眼底照相分级在评估糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病黄斑水肿严重程度方面的差异。
Retina. 2013 Jul-Aug;33(7):1393-9. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318286c952.
5
(18)F-DOPA PET with and without MRI fusion, a receiver operator characteristics comparison.(18)有和没有MRI融合的F-DOPA正电子发射断层扫描,接受者操作特征比较。
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;2(4):475-82. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
6
Prospective validation of the provisional criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.儿童起病系统性红斑狼疮治疗反应评估临时性标准的前瞻性验证。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Mar;62(3):335-44. doi: 10.1002/acr.20103.
7
Performance of breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis: dependence on image selection.乳腺超声计算机辅助诊断的性能:对图像选择的依赖性。
Acad Radiol. 2008 Oct;15(10):1234-45. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.04.016.
8
Breast US computer-aided diagnosis workstation: performance with a large clinical diagnostic population.乳腺超声计算机辅助诊断工作站:在大量临床诊断人群中的性能表现
Radiology. 2008 Aug;248(2):392-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482071778. Epub 2008 Jun 23.
9
Proteomic analysis of amniotic fluid to identify women with preterm labor and intra-amniotic inflammation/infection: the use of a novel computational method to analyze mass spectrometric profiling.羊水的蛋白质组学分析以识别早产和羊膜腔内炎症/感染的女性:使用一种新型计算方法分析质谱图谱。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Jun;21(6):367-88. doi: 10.1080/14767050802045848.