• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区实践中的配药错误与用药指导

Dispensing errors and counseling in community practice.

作者信息

Allan E L, Barker K N, Malloy M J, Heller W M

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Care Systems, Auburn University, Ala., USA.

出版信息

Am Pharm. 1995 Dec;NS35(12):25-33.

PMID:8546071
Abstract

A disguised-patient technique was used to study the nature and frequency of dispensing errors and quality of patient medication counseling in 100 randomly selected community pharmacies. Analysis of 100 prescription orders dispensed detected 24 dispensing errors, of which 4 were clinically significant. Oral counseling was provided to 64 of the patients, covering an average of 3 of the 14 categories of drug information that the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA '90) requires pharmacists to consider when counseling Medicaid patients. In addition to prescriber's label instructions, pharmacists provided written counseling information, including auxiliary labels and receipts, to 98% of the patients, but it covered only an average of six OBRA '90 categories. The results suggest that problems with the quality of community pharmacy medication counseling and dispensing accuracy require immediate attention.

摘要

采用伪装患者技术,对100家随机选取的社区药房的配药错误性质与频率以及患者用药咨询质量进行了研究。对100份已调配的处方进行分析后发现24起配药错误,其中4起具有临床显著性。为64名患者提供了口头咨询,平均涵盖了1990年《综合预算协调法案》(OBRA '90)要求药剂师在为医疗补助患者提供咨询时考虑的14类药物信息中的3类。除了处方医生标签说明外,药剂师还向98%的患者提供了书面咨询信息,包括辅助标签和收据,但平均仅涵盖6类OBRA '90要求的内容。结果表明,社区药房用药咨询质量和配药准确性问题亟待关注。

相似文献

1
Dispensing errors and counseling in community practice.社区实践中的配药错误与用药指导
Am Pharm. 1995 Dec;NS35(12):25-33.
2
Dispensing errors and counseling quality in 100 pharmacies.100家药店的配药错误与咨询质量
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Mar-Apr;49(2):171-80. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08130.
3
Pharmacist workload and pharmacy characteristics associated with the dispensing of potentially clinically important drug-drug interactions.与潜在具有临床重要性的药物相互作用配药相关的药剂师工作量及药房特征
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5):456-62. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000257839.83765.07.
4
Discharging patients with prescriptions instead of medications: sequelae in a teaching hospital.给患者开处方而非发放药品出院:一家教学医院的后遗症
Pediatrics. 1996 Apr;97(4):481-5.
5
Measuring the assessment and counseling provided with the supply of nonprescription asthma reliever medication: a simulated patient study.评估非处方哮喘缓解药物供应所提供的评估与咨询服务:一项模拟患者研究。
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Sep;43(9):1512-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M086. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
6
Identifying and assisting low-literacy patients with medication use: a survey of community pharmacies.识别并协助低识字能力患者用药:社区药房调查
Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Sep;39(9):1441-5. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G094. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
7
Provision of drug information to patients by pharmacists: the impact of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 a decade later.药剂师向患者提供药物信息:1990年《综合预算协调法案》十年后的影响。
Am J Ther. 2003 Mar-Apr;10(2):93-103. doi: 10.1097/00045391-200303000-00004.
8
Accuracy of dispensing in a high-volume, hospital-based outpatient pharmacy.大型医院门诊药房配药的准确性。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994 Nov 15;51(22):2793-7.
9
Evaluation of the clinical value of pharmacists' modifications of prescription errors.药师对处方错误进行修改的临床价值评估。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Nov;58(5):503-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02181.x.
10
Pharmaceutical care in community pharmacies: practice and research in the US.社区药房的药学服务:美国的实践与研究
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jul-Aug;40(7-8):1400-6. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G545.

引用本文的文献

1
Medication errors in community pharmacies: a systematic review of the international literature.社区药房的用药差错:国际文献的系统评价
PLoS One. 2025 May 20;20(5):e0322392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322392. eCollection 2025.
2
Dispensing Errors and Self-medication Practices-Pharmacists' Experience in Tabuk: A Cross-sectional Study.配药错误与自我药疗行为——塔布克地区药剂师的经验:一项横断面研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Apr-Jun;16(2):72-78. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1288_23. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
3
Human factors and ergonomics methods for pharmacy research and clinical practice.
药学研究和临床实践中的人为因素和工效学方法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Dec;17(12):2019-2027. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.024. Epub 2021 May 2.
4
Dispensing errors in community pharmacies in the United Arab Emirates: investigating incidence, types, severity, and causes.阿拉伯联合酋长国社区药房的配药错误:调查发生率、类型、严重程度及原因。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Oct-Dec;18(4):2111. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.4.2111. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
5
Detecting Potential Medication Selection Errors During Outpatient Pharmacy Processing of Electronic Prescriptions With the RxNorm Application Programming Interface: Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.使用RxNorm应用程序编程接口在电子处方门诊药房处理过程中检测潜在的用药选择错误:回顾性观察队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Mar 11;8(3):e16073. doi: 10.2196/16073.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of community pharmacy error rates in the USA: 1993-2015.美国社区药房错误率的系统评价与荟萃分析:1993 - 2015年
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Oct 2;7(4):e000193. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000193. eCollection 2018.
7
Medication dispensing errors in Palestinian community pharmacy practice: a formal consensus using the Delphi technique.巴勒斯坦社区药房实践中的药物调配错误:运用德尔菲技术达成的正式共识
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Oct;38(5):1112-23. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0338-x. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
8
The effect of the electronic transmission of prescriptions on dispensing errors and prescription enhancements made in English community pharmacies: a naturalistic stepped wedge study.电子处方传输对英国社区药房配药错误及处方改进的影响:一项自然主义阶梯楔形研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Aug;23(8):629-38. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002776. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
9
A prescription analysis exercise in a pharmaceutical care laboratory course.药学实习课中的处方分析练习。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Mar 12;77(2):32. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77232.
10
Medication errors: the importance of safe dispensing.用药差错:安全调配的重要性。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Jun;67(6):676-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03428.x.