Hursh S R, Winger G
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Nov;64(3):373-84. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-373.
The concepts of behavioral economics have proven to be useful for understanding the environmental control of overall levels of responding for a variety of commodities, including reinforcement by drug self-administration. These general concepts have implications for the assessment of abuse liability and drug abuse intervention and the formulation of public policy on drug abuse. An essential requirement is the ability to compare the demand for different drugs directly in order to assess relative abuse liability, and to compare demand for the same drug under different environmental and biological interventions to assess their ability to reduce demand. Until now, such comparisons were hampered by the confounding effect of varying drug doses and potencies that prevent quantitative comparisons of demand elasticity--sensitivity of consumption and responding to the constraint of price (effort). In this paper we describe a procedure to normalize demand-curve analysis that permits dose- and potency-independent comparisons of demand across drugs. The procedure is shown to be effective for comparing drug demand within and across the drug classes. The technique permits a quantitative ordering of demand that is consistent with the peak levels of responding maintained by the drugs. The same technique is generalized for the comparison of other types of reinforcers under different biological conditions.
行为经济学的概念已被证明有助于理解对包括药物自我给药强化在内的各种商品总体反应水平的环境控制。这些一般概念对滥用可能性评估、药物滥用干预以及药物滥用公共政策的制定具有启示意义。一个基本要求是能够直接比较不同药物的需求,以便评估相对滥用可能性,并比较同一药物在不同环境和生物干预下的需求,以评估它们降低需求的能力。到目前为止,这种比较因不同药物剂量和效力的混杂效应而受阻,这些效应妨碍了对需求弹性(消费和反应对价格(努力)约束的敏感性)的定量比较。在本文中,我们描述了一种使需求曲线分析标准化的程序,该程序允许对不同药物的需求进行与剂量和效力无关的比较。该程序被证明对于比较药物类别内部和不同药物类别之间的药物需求是有效的。该技术允许对需求进行定量排序,这与药物维持的反应峰值水平一致。同一技术被推广用于比较不同生物学条件下其他类型的强化物。