Montgomery R R, Malawista S E, Feen K J, Bockenstedt L K
Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.
J Exp Med. 1996 Jan 1;183(1):261-9. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.1.261.
The outer surface proteins (Osps) of Borrelia burgdorferi, the etiologic agent of Lyme disease, are principle targets of protective immune responses against this organism. Whereas most North American strains of B. burgdorferi in culture express an abundant amount of Osp A, antibodies to this protein are either absent or only weakly detected in the sera of naturally infected patients or experimentally infected mice. In contrast, Osp C, which has variable expression on cultured organisms; elicits an early, strong humoral response. To examine this paradox, we have studied the in vivo adaptation of a cloned population of B. burgdorferi strain N40 during the early course of experimental murine borreliosis. As in human disease, antibodies to Osp A were only weakly present in the early immune repertoire after murine inoculation with low dose (10(3)) spirochetes. In contrast, antibodies to Osp C were prominent, even though on cultured spirochetes Osp C mRNA and protein expression could not be detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or indirect immunofluorescence, respectively. These observations led us to investigate the expression of Osp A and Osp C in vivo. By direct fluorescent staining of uncultured spirochetes ex vivo and by PCR amplification of spirochetal mRNA, we show that Osp C is indeed expressed by some spirochetes after infection in the mouse. Spirochetes expressing Osp A could also be detected within the first 2 wk of infection, but not at 30 d. Osp A mRNA, although present at day 14 of infection, could not be amplified by RT-PCR at day 30, suggesting that the expression of this Osp is transient. This further implies that the late burst in Osp A antibodies in both mice and humans may be anamnestic. These results indicate that either Osp C is upregulated on spirochetes after infection, or Osp C-expressing spirochetes expand preferentially over those expressing Osp A during infection. These results have important implications for vaccine design and offer one explanation for the failure of Osp A antibodies to eradicate spirochetes from the infected host.
莱姆病的病原体伯氏疏螺旋体的外表面蛋白(Osps)是针对该病原体的保护性免疫反应的主要靶点。尽管大多数北美培养的伯氏疏螺旋体菌株表达大量的Osp A,但在自然感染患者或实验感染小鼠的血清中,针对该蛋白的抗体要么不存在,要么只能微弱检测到。相比之下,在培养的生物体上表达可变的Osp C会引发早期强烈的体液反应。为了研究这一矛盾现象,我们研究了伯氏疏螺旋体菌株N40的克隆群体在实验性鼠类疏螺旋体病早期过程中的体内适应性。与人类疾病一样,在用低剂量(10³)螺旋体接种小鼠后,早期免疫库中针对Osp A的抗体仅微弱存在。相比之下,针对Osp C的抗体很突出,尽管在培养的螺旋体上分别通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)或间接免疫荧光无法检测到Osp C mRNA和蛋白表达。这些观察结果促使我们研究Osp A和Osp C在体内的表达。通过对未培养的螺旋体进行离体直接荧光染色以及对螺旋体mRNA进行PCR扩增,我们表明在小鼠感染后,一些螺旋体确实表达Osp C。在感染的前2周内也能检测到表达Osp A的螺旋体,但在30天时未检测到。Osp A mRNA虽然在感染第14天时存在,但在第30天时通过RT-PCR无法扩增,这表明该Osp的表达是短暂的。这进一步意味着在小鼠和人类中Osp A抗体的后期激增可能是回忆性的。这些结果表明,要么感染后螺旋体上的Osp C被上调,要么在感染期间表达Osp C的螺旋体比表达Osp A的螺旋体优先扩增。这些结果对疫苗设计具有重要意义,并为Osp A抗体无法从感染宿主中清除螺旋体提供了一种解释。