Jones G K, Swerdlow C, Reichenbach D D, Lones M, Poole J E, Dolack G L, Kudenchuk P J, Bardy G H
Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Nov;18(11):2062-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb03868.x.
The purpose of this report is to review the gross and histological cardiac anatomical findings in patients with chronically indwelling coronary sinus leads at the time of autopsy or cardiac transplantation. Transvenous cardioverter defibrillators offer effective protection against sudden death. The use of a coronary sinus electrode has been shown in some patients to decrease the defibrillation threshold. The anatomical consequences of chronically indwelling coronary sinus cardioversion/defibrillation electrodes in patients having transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillators is unknown. The hearts of seven patients with chronically indwelling coronary sinus electrodes were evaluated following autopsy (n = 2) or cardiac transplantation (n = 5). The coronary sinus electrode in each case was a 6.5 French silicone lead with a 5-cm long defibrillation coil (Medtronic CS lead model 6933) that was positioned as distally as possible within the coronary sinus at the time of implantable cardioverter defibrillator surgery. The seven hearts examined were derived from patients whose age ranged between 49 and 69 (mean 56 +/- 7 years). Six had coronary artery disease and one had idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. The time from implant to death or cardiac transplantation was 8 +/- 6 months, range 1-18 months. In all seven patients, there was no evidence of any significant damage from the presence of the coronary sinus lead. The only finding in each case was the scattered presence of a thin white fibrous sheath over the lead that intermittently adhered to the coronary sinus endothelium and, in the two patients transplanted 1-3 months after implantable cardioverter defibrillator insertion, a mild inflammation reaction adjacent to the leads in the coronary sinus endothelium. There was no evidence of coronary sinus occlusion, adjacent coronary artery injury, coronary sinus perforation, coronary sinus burn, or myocardial injury adjacent to the lead. Cause of death was due to end-stage congestive heart failure and thrombotic stroke, respectively, in the two patients examined at autopsy. Coronary sinus defibrillation leads can be used safely without harmful anatomical effect.
本报告旨在回顾尸检或心脏移植时长期留置冠状窦导线患者的心脏大体及组织学解剖学发现。经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器可有效预防猝死。在一些患者中,使用冠状窦电极已显示可降低除颤阈值。对于植入经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器的患者,长期留置冠状窦心脏复律/除颤电极的解剖学后果尚不清楚。对7例长期留置冠状窦电极患者的心脏在尸检(n = 2)或心脏移植(n = 5)后进行了评估。每例中的冠状窦电极均为6.5法国规格的硅胶导线,带有一个5厘米长的除颤线圈(美敦力CS导线型号6933),在植入式心脏复律除颤器手术时尽可能远端地置于冠状窦内。所检查的7颗心脏来自年龄在49至69岁之间(平均56±7岁)的患者。6例患有冠状动脉疾病,1例患有特发性扩张型心肌病。从植入到死亡或心脏移植的时间为8±6个月,范围为1至18个月。在所有7例患者中,均未发现冠状窦导线存在造成任何重大损害的证据。每例中的唯一发现是导线表面散在存在一层薄的白色纤维鞘,其间歇性地附着于冠状窦内皮,并且在植入式心脏复律除颤器植入后1至3个月接受移植的2例患者中,冠状窦内皮中导线附近有轻度炎症反应。没有冠状窦闭塞、相邻冠状动脉损伤、冠状窦穿孔、冠状窦灼伤或导线附近心肌损伤的证据。在尸检的2例患者中,死亡原因分别为终末期充血性心力衰竭和血栓性中风。冠状窦除颤导线可安全使用,无有害的解剖学影响。