Rodero L L, Davel G O, Vivot W, Canteros C E, Fernández C
Instituto Nacional de Microbiología Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rev Argent Microbiol. 1995 Apr-Jun;27(2):81-9.
A microdilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts was evaluated, based on the macro broth dilution method standardized by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing. Both methods were compared using six reference strains with different patterns of susceptibility to the following antifungal drugs: amphotericin B (AMB), flucytosine (5FC), fluconazole (FCZ), itraconazole (ITZ), ketoconazole (KTZ) and miconazole (MCZ). Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) results obtained by both methods differed only in 1 or 2 dilutions. Microdilution MIC's determined as visual endpoints and as quantitative measurement of 80% inhibition of relative growth showed a significant correlation (p < 0.001) for AMB, 5FC, FCZ, MCZ and ITZ, conversely no correlation (p = 1.00) for KTZ was observed as determined with 47 local isolates of Candida albicans.
基于美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)抗真菌药敏试验小组委员会标准化的常量肉汤稀释法,对酵母的微量稀释抗真菌药敏试验进行了评估。使用对以下抗真菌药物具有不同药敏模式的六种参考菌株,对这两种方法进行了比较:两性霉素B(AMB)、氟胞嘧啶(5FC)、氟康唑(FCZ)、伊曲康唑(ITZ)、酮康唑(KTZ)和咪康唑(MCZ)。两种方法获得的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)结果仅在1或2个稀释度上有所不同。对于AMB、5FC、FCZ、MCZ和ITZ,以视觉终点和相对生长80%抑制的定量测量确定的微量稀释MIC显示出显著相关性(p < 0.001),相反,在用47株白色念珠菌本地分离株进行测定时,未观察到KTZ的相关性(p = 1.00)。