Hornberger J C, Brown B W, Halpern J
Department of Health Research & Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA.
Stat Med. 1995 Oct 30;14(20):2249-59. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780142008.
Researchers and administrators must decide which clinical trials are worth doing and how many subjects are needed for a trial. We calculated sample size considering the costs of implementing the results of the trial and the trial costs using (1) Neyman-Pearson methods and (2) a Bayesian cost-benefit method. We illustrate these methods in a clinical trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health that compares two levels of blood urea nitrogen clearance by haemodialysis for patients with end-stage renal disease. When applied to evaluations of research proposals, these methods may help researchers to decide whether to begin a study, and, if so, how many subjects to enrol in it. These methods should be especially useful for large studies intended to inform health policy.
研究人员和管理人员必须决定哪些临床试验值得开展,以及一项试验需要多少受试者。我们使用(1)奈曼-皮尔逊方法和(2)贝叶斯成本效益方法,在考虑实施试验结果的成本和试验成本的情况下计算样本量。我们在美国国立卫生研究院资助的一项临床试验中阐述了这些方法,该试验比较了终末期肾病患者通过血液透析清除血尿素氮的两种水平。当应用于研究提案评估时,这些方法可能有助于研究人员决定是否开始一项研究,如果是,则确定要纳入多少受试者。这些方法对于旨在为卫生政策提供信息的大型研究应该特别有用。