腹腔镜胆囊切除术。密西西比州的经验。 - Suppr | 超能文献

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Mississippi experience.

作者信息

Voyles C R

机构信息

University of Mississippi, Jackson, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1995 Nov;9(11):1225-30.

Abstract

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

相似文献

1

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Mississippi experience.腹腔镜胆囊切除术。密西西比州的经验。

Surg Endosc. 1995 Nov;9(11):1225-30.

2

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Australia--outcomes and costs.

Surg Endosc. 1995 Nov;9(11):1230-5.

3

CBD stones--outcomes and costs. Laparoscopic transcystic techniques other than choledochoscopy.CBD结石——治疗结果与成本。除经胆道镜检查外的腹腔镜经胆囊技术。

Surg Endosc. 1995 Nov;9(11):1242-4.

4

Low-cost laparoscopic cholecystectomy.低成本腹腔镜胆囊切除术。

Br J Surg. 2002 Dec;89(12):1602-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02273.x.

5

Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic and mini-cholecystectomy in a prospective randomized trial.

Surg Endosc. 1995 Nov;9(11):1221-4.

6

The added cost of urgent cholecystectomy to health systems.急诊胆囊切除术给卫生系统增加的成本。

J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Jul;197(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00338-7.

7

The cost of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in a community hospital.社区医院中腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的费用

Surg Endosc. 1995 Mar;9(3):314-23; discussion 324. doi: 10.1007/BF00187776.

8

Average cholecystectomy charges vary greatly depending on location of procedure.胆囊切除术的平均费用因手术地点的不同而有很大差异。

Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep. 1999 Jun;4(6):92-4.

9

[Laparoscopic versus mini-cholecystectomy: analysis of hospital costs and social costs in a prospective randomized study].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术与小切口胆囊切除术：一项前瞻性随机研究中的医院成本和社会成本分析]

Chir Ital. 2002 Sep-Oct;54(5):685-92.

10

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术：病例匹配对照研究的结果与成本分析

Ann Surg. 2008 Jun;247(6):987-93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318172501f.

引用本文的文献

1

Outcomes assessment and minimally invasive surgery: historical perspective and future directions.结果评估与微创手术：历史视角与未来方向。

Surg Endosc. 2000 Oct;14(10):883-90. doi: 10.1007/s004640000220.