Kiberd B A, Jindal K K
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
BMJ. 1995 Dec 16;311(7020):1595-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7020.1595.
To examine the conditions necessary to make screening for microalbuminuria in patients with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus cost effective.
This economic evaluation compared two strategies designed to prevent the development of end stage renal disease in patients with insulin dependent diabetes with disease for five years. Strategy A, screening for microalbuminuria as currently recommended, was compared with strategy B, a protocol in which patients were screened for hypertension and macroproteinuria.
Patients identified in both strategies were treated with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor.
Computer simulation.
Strategy costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs).
The model predicted that strategy A would produce an additional 0.00967 QALYs at a present value cost of $261.53 (1990 US$) per patient (or an incremental cost/QALY of $27,041.69) over strategy B. The incremental cost/QALY for strategy A over B was sensitive to several variables. If the positive predictive value of screening for microalbuminuria (impact of false label and unnecessary treatment) is < 0.72, the effect of treatment to delay progression from microalbuminuria to macroproteinuria is < 1.6 years, the cumulative incidence of diabetic nephropathy falls to < 20%, or > 64% of patients demonstrate hypertension at the onset of microalbuminuria, then the incremental costs/QALY will exceed $75,000.
Whether microalbuminuria surveillance in this population is cost effective requires more information. Being aware of the costs, recommendation pitfalls, and gaps in our knowledge should help focus our efforts to provide cost effective care to this population.
探讨使胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者微量白蛋白尿筛查具有成本效益所需的条件。
这项经济学评估比较了两种旨在预防胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者发生终末期肾病达五年的策略。将策略A(按照当前推荐筛查微量白蛋白尿)与策略B(一种对患者进行高血压和大量蛋白尿筛查的方案)进行比较。
两种策略中识别出的患者均接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗。
计算机模拟。
策略成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)。
模型预测,与策略B相比,策略A每位患者将产生额外的0.00967个QALY,现值成本为261.53美元(1990年美元)(即每QALY的增量成本为27,041.69美元)。策略A相对于策略B的增量成本/QALY对几个变量敏感。如果微量白蛋白尿筛查的阳性预测值(假阳性标签和不必要治疗的影响)<0.72,治疗延缓微量白蛋白尿进展为大量蛋白尿的效果<1.6年,糖尿病肾病的累积发病率降至<20%,或>64%的患者在微量白蛋白尿发病时出现高血压,那么增量成本/QALY将超过75,000美元。
对该人群进行微量白蛋白尿监测是否具有成本效益需要更多信息。了解成本、推荐中的缺陷以及我们知识上的差距应有助于集中努力为该人群提供具有成本效益的护理。