Lewis M A, Spitzer W O, Heinemann L A, MacRae K D, Bruppacher R, Thorogood M
Potsdam Institute of Pharmacoepidemiology and Technology Assessment (PIPTA), Germany.
BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):88-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.88.
To test whether use of combined oral contraceptives containing third generation progestogens is associated with altered risk of myocardial infarction.
Matched case-control study.
16 centres in Austria, France, Germany, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
Cases were 153 women aged 16-44 with a myocardial infarction event. Controls were 498 women (at least 3 controls per case) unaffected by myocardial infarction who were matched with their corresponding case for age and for hospital or community setting within four months of the index infarction.
Odds ratios derived with stratified analyses and unconditional logistic regression to adjust for potential confounding variables.
The estimated odds ratio for myocardial infarction of third compared with second generation oral contraceptives among all 651 study subjects was 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.1 to 1.2) (P = 0.11). The odds ratio for the United Kingdom and Germany alone was 0.45 (0.1 to 1.8) (P = 0.26). Other odds ratios for the five countries were 3.1 (1.5 to 6.3) (P = 0.003) for use of second generation products v no current use and 1.1 (0.4 to 3.4) (P = 0.9) for use of third generation products v no current use. Among the confounding variables the independent contribution of smoking (for which adjustment was made in the above estimates) proved to be important (10.1 (5.7 to 17.9), P < 0.001).
An odds ratio of 0.45 with wide confidence intervals shows that third generation oral contraceptives compared with second generation products are associated with a reduced risk of myocardial infarction or with no difference. This finding from an interim analysis should be interpreted with extreme caution. However, the excess risk of venous thromboembolism associated with the use of third generation products may be balanced by the reduced risk of myocardial infarction associated with the same products.
检验使用含第三代孕激素的复方口服避孕药是否与心肌梗死风险改变相关。
配对病例对照研究。
奥地利、法国、德国、瑞士和英国的16个中心。
病例为153名年龄在16 - 44岁之间发生心肌梗死事件的女性。对照为498名未患心肌梗死的女性(每个病例至少有3名对照),她们在索引梗死发生后四个月内按年龄以及医院或社区环境与相应病例进行匹配。
通过分层分析和无条件逻辑回归得出比值比,以调整潜在的混杂变量。
在所有651名研究对象中,第三代口服避孕药与第二代口服避孕药相比,心肌梗死的估计比值比为0.36(95%置信区间0.1至1.2)(P = 0.11)。仅英国和德国的比值比为0.45(0.1至1.8)(P = 0.26)。五个国家中,第二代产品使用者与未使用者相比的其他比值比为3.1(1.5至6.3)(P = 0.003),第三代产品使用者与未使用者相比的比值比为1.1(0.4至3.4)(P = 0.9)。在混杂变量中,吸烟的独立作用(上述估计中已对其进行调整)被证明很重要(10.1(5.7至17.9),P < 0.001)。
比值比为0.45且置信区间较宽表明,与第二代产品相比,第三代口服避孕药与心肌梗死风险降低或无差异相关。这一中期分析结果应极其谨慎地解读。然而,与使用第三代产品相关的静脉血栓栓塞额外风险可能会被同一产品相关的心肌梗死风险降低所平衡。