Adalbjarnardottir S
Faculty of Social Sciences, Oddi, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Child Dev. 1995 Dec;66(6):1739-51.
The role of social anxiety, social withdrawal, and locus of control in the developmental level of interpersonal negotiation strategies (INS) when resolving hypothetical conflicts was examined in a short-term longitudinal study (fall and spring). Applying a balanced design, 96 children aged 8 and 11 from 8 classes participated in the study. At both assessments, results indicated that sociable children were more likely to exhibit greater competence in INS than socially withdrawn children. However, both concurrent and longitudinal analyses indicated that degree of social anxiety tended to influence this relation. Among less socially anxious children, the sociable children did exhibit greater INS competence than those more socially withdrawn, but this relation was not revealed among the more socially anxious children. Finally, on the whole, children who showed internal locus of control were more competent at INS than children with external locus of control.
在一项短期纵向研究(秋季和春季)中,研究了社交焦虑、社交退缩和控制点在解决假设冲突时人际谈判策略(INS)发展水平中的作用。采用平衡设计,来自8个班级的96名8岁和11岁儿童参与了该研究。在两次评估中,结果均表明,善于社交的儿童比社交退缩的儿童更有可能在INS中表现出更高的能力。然而,同时分析和纵向分析均表明,社交焦虑程度往往会影响这种关系。在社交焦虑程度较低的儿童中,善于社交的儿童在INS方面确实比社交退缩程度较高的儿童表现出更高的能力,但在社交焦虑程度较高的儿童中并未发现这种关系。最后,总体而言,表现出内控型的儿童在INS方面比外控型儿童更有能力。