Chervenak F A, McCullough L B
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York, USA.
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;87(2):302-5. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00387-8.
When cesarean delivery is substantively supported and vaginal delivery is not supported in beneficence-based clinical judgment, the physician should offer and recommend only cesarean delivery. When both cesarean and vaginal delivery are substantively supported in beneficence-based clinical judgment, the physician should offer both, discuss any controversy, and make a recommendation. When cesarean delivery is substantively supported and vaginal delivery is more substantively supported in beneficence-based clinical judgment, the physician should offer both and recommend vaginal delivery. If cesarean delivery is not supported and vaginal delivery is substantively supported in beneficence-based clinical judgment, the physician should offer only vaginal delivery. When cesarean delivery is requested and well supported solely in autonomy-based clinical judgment, the physician should repeat the recommendation for vaginal delivery and either perform cesarean delivery or make a referral. Physicians may use this algorithm in negotiating managed care contracts.
当基于行善原则的临床判断实质性支持剖宫产而不支持阴道分娩时,医生应仅提供并推荐剖宫产。当基于行善原则的临床判断实质性支持剖宫产和阴道分娩两者时,医生应同时提供两者,讨论任何争议,并给出推荐意见。当基于行善原则的临床判断实质性支持剖宫产而更实质性支持阴道分娩时,医生应同时提供两者并推荐阴道分娩。如果基于行善原则的临床判断不支持剖宫产而实质性支持阴道分娩,医生应仅提供阴道分娩。当仅基于自主原则的临床判断要求并充分支持剖宫产时,医生应再次推荐阴道分娩,要么实施剖宫产,要么进行转诊。医生在协商管理式医疗合同时可使用此算法。