• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由于超声评估胎龄导致的早产和过期产研究中的偏倚。

Bias in studies of preterm and postterm delivery due to ultrasound assessment of gestational age.

作者信息

Henriksen T B, Wilcox A J, Hedegaard M, Secher N J

机构信息

Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, Aarhus University, Denmark.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 1995 Sep;6(5):533-7. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199509000-00012.

DOI:10.1097/00001648-199509000-00012
PMID:8562631
Abstract

Ultrasound measurement of fetal dimensions is widely used for estimating gestational age. A little-discussed limitation of this method is that variations in fetal size at a given stage of pregnancy are converted to differences in gestational age. Factors that affect pregnancy duration often affect fetal size also. We explore how the effect of such factors may be biased when gestational age is determined by ultrasound. We selected 3,606 women with singleton pregnancies (1989-1991) who had an early ultrasound measurement of fetal biparietal diameter (BPD) and a good-quality history of last menstrual period (LMP). Using the two measures of gestational age, we estimated risk of preterm and postterm delivery for female babies vs males and for smoking women vs nonsmoking women. There was a 13% excess of preterm delivery among female babies when gestational age was determined by ultrasound, but no excess when gestational age was defined by LMP. For postterm delivery, female babies had a 19% lower risk with ultrasound-defined age, but no deficit with LMP-defined age. We found a similar bias with ultrasound in the analysis of maternal smoking. Thus, factors that reduce fetal size inflate the risk of preterm delivery and deflate the risk of postterm delivery when gestational age is based on ultrasound measurement of the fetus. This bias can distort the relative risk of preterm or postterm delivery by 10-20%.

摘要

超声测量胎儿大小被广泛用于估算孕周。这种方法一个较少被讨论的局限性在于,怀孕特定阶段胎儿大小的差异会被转化为孕周的差异。影响孕期时长的因素通常也会影响胎儿大小。我们探讨了在通过超声确定孕周时,这些因素的影响可能会如何产生偏差。我们选取了3606名单胎妊娠女性(1989 - 1991年),她们在孕早期进行了胎儿双顶径(BPD)的超声测量,并且有质量良好的末次月经(LMP)记录。利用这两种孕周测量方法,我们估算了女婴与男婴以及吸烟女性与非吸烟女性早产和过期产的风险。当通过超声确定孕周时,女婴的早产风险高出13%,但当通过末次月经确定孕周时则没有这种情况。对于过期产,以超声确定的孕周计算,女婴的风险低19%,但以末次月经确定的孕周计算则没有差异。在对孕妇吸烟情况的分析中,我们发现超声测量也存在类似的偏差。因此,当孕周基于胎儿的超声测量时,那些减小胎儿大小的因素会夸大早产风险,同时降低过期产风险。这种偏差会使早产或过期产的相对风险扭曲10% - 20%。

相似文献

1
Bias in studies of preterm and postterm delivery due to ultrasound assessment of gestational age.由于超声评估胎龄导致的早产和过期产研究中的偏倚。
Epidemiology. 1995 Sep;6(5):533-7. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199509000-00012.
2
Algorithms for combining menstrual and ultrasound estimates of gestational age: consequences for rates of preterm and postterm birth.结合月经周期和超声检查估算孕周的算法:对早产和过期产发生率的影响
BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):718-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01068.x.
3
Expected day of delivery from ultrasound dating versus last menstrual period--obstetric outcome when dates mismatch.超声推算预产期与末次月经推算预产期的比较——日期不符时的产科结局
BJOG. 2008 Apr;115(5):585-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01678.x.
4
Postterm infants: too big or too small?过期产儿:太大还是太小?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Feb;164(2):619-24. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)80035-9.
5
The impact of fetal, maternal and external factors on prediction of the day of delivery by the use of ultrasound.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Feb;11(2):99-103. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11020099.x.
6
Maternal smoking and gestational age in twin pregnancies.双胎妊娠中的母亲吸烟与孕周
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Oct;80(10):926-30. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.801009.x.
7
Maternal and fetal factors which affect fetometry: use of in vitro fertilization and birth register data.影响胎儿测量的母体和胎儿因素:体外受精和出生登记数据的应用。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Oct;170(2):372-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.029. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
8
Adverse obstetric outcome in fetuses that are smaller than expected at second trimester routine ultrasound examination.孕中期常规超声检查时小于预期胎儿的不良产科结局。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Sep;81(9):846-51. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810908.x.
9
Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation.在妊娠早期通过超声和末次月经预测分娩日期。
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Feb;97(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01131-5.
10
A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records.利用加利福尼亚州关联的出生记录和产前筛查记录,比较基于末次月经(LMP)和基于超声的孕周估计值。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;21 Suppl 2:62-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00862.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning for accurate estimation of fetal gestational age based on ultrasound images.基于超声图像的机器学习用于准确估计胎儿孕周。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Mar 9;6(1):36. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00774-2.
2
Influence of different methods for calculating gestational age at birth on prematurity and small for gestational age proportions: a systematic review with meta-analysis.不同出生时胎龄计算方法对早产儿和小于胎龄儿比例的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Feb 11;23(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05411-0.
3
Preterm disparities between foreign and Swedish born mothers depend on the method used to estimate gestational age. A Swedish population-based register study.
出生时胎龄估计方法不同,外国母亲与瑞典本地母亲的早产儿比例存在差异:一项基于人群的瑞典注册研究
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 22;16(2):e0247138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247138. eCollection 2021.
4
Epidemiological Studies on Fetal Loss - Better Data and Research Methods are Needed.胎儿丢失的流行病学研究——需要更好的数据和研究方法。
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Aug 13;12:883-887. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S256297. eCollection 2020.
5
Early identification of preterm neonates at birth with a Tablet App for the Simplified Gestational Age Score (T-SGAS) when ultrasound gestational age dating is unavailable: A validation study.在无法进行超声孕周检查时,使用简化胎龄评分(T-SGAS)平板电脑应用程序(App)对出生时的早产儿进行早期识别:一项验证研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 31;15(8):e0238315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238315. eCollection 2020.
6
Discordant dating of pregnancy by LMP and ultrasound and its implications in perinatal statistics.末次月经日期(LMP)与超声检查推算的孕周不符及其对围产期统计数据的影响。
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2020 Jan-Mar;30(1):27-31. doi: 10.4103/ijri.IJRI_383_19. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
7
Measurement of birth outcomes in analyses of the impact of maternal influenza vaccination.母源流感疫苗接种影响分析中的出生结局测量。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2019 Nov;13(6):547-555. doi: 10.1111/irv.12673. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
8
Association between fetal sex, birthweight percentile and adverse pregnancy outcome.胎儿性别、出生体重百分位与不良妊娠结局的关系。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jan;99(1):48-58. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13709. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
9
Clinical Evaluations Have Low Sensitivity for Identifying Preterm Infants in a Clinical Trial in a Limited Resource Setting.在资源有限环境下的一项临床试验中,临床评估在识别早产儿方面敏感性较低。
Glob Pediatr Health. 2019 Jun 25;6:2333794X19857402. doi: 10.1177/2333794X19857402. eCollection 2019.
10
Placental epigenetic clocks: estimating gestational age using placental DNA methylation levels.胎盘表观遗传时钟:利用胎盘DNA甲基化水平估算孕周
Aging (Albany NY). 2019 Jun 24;11(12):4238-4253. doi: 10.18632/aging.102049.