Suppr超能文献

使用编码系统保真度比较临床词汇表。

Comparing clinical vocabularies using coding system fidelity.

作者信息

Klimczak J C, Hahn A W, Sievert M E, Petroski G, Hewett J

机构信息

Medical Informatics Group, University of Missouri-Columbia, MO 65211, USA.

出版信息

Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1995:883-7.

Abstract

Much effort has been directed toward the development of an ideal multipurpose controlled medical vocabulary for use in human and veterinary medicine. SNOMED International is one effort that has resulted in a larger and more complex nomenclature system. Although it was able to code more concepts, SNOMED International failed to statistically improve vocabulary fidelity when compared with the 30+ year old SNVDO vocabulary. We found that SNOMED has a lower intercoder consistency than SNVDO and that a greater number of codes were necessary to represent an individual concept. Our study shows a significant Coder-Vocabulary interaction which suggests that more emphasis should be placed on coding guidelines and coder training. Clinician data entry and coding may be necessary for maximum vocabulary fidelity.

摘要

人们付出了很多努力来开发一种理想的多用途受控医学词汇表,用于人类和兽医学。国际医学术语系统命名法(SNOMED International)就是这样一项努力的成果,它形成了一个更大、更复杂的命名系统。尽管它能够编码更多的概念,但与已有30多年历史的SNVDO词汇表相比,国际医学术语系统命名法在统计学上未能提高词汇的准确性。我们发现,国际医学术语系统命名法的编码员之间的一致性低于SNVDO,并且需要更多的代码来表示一个单独的概念。我们的研究显示了编码员与词汇表之间存在显著的交互作用,这表明应该更加重视编码指南和编码员培训。为了实现最大程度的词汇准确性,临床医生的数据录入和编码可能是必要的。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验