Baker C, Schuller D E
Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Cancer Nurs. 1995 Dec;18(6):452-7.
Increased survival rates and disease control dictate that quality of life after treatment for head and neck cancer be evaluated. A disease-specific measure was developed from interviews with 115 patients, and items reflect the terminology used by the patients to describe treatment-related problems and concerns. Validity and reliability of this self-report scale were tested with 172 head and neck cancer patients and 30 patients who had breast and gynecological cancers. Discriminate validity was excellent. Convergent validity of the scale was demonstrated by Pearson correlations of 0.68 with a general health status measure, 0.68 with the Karnofsky Performance Scale, and 0.76 with the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Reliability as measured by Cronbach's alpha was 0.88. Analysis of variance demonstrated that the scale was sensitive to differences in stage of disease (p = 0.017) and extent of first surgery (p = 0.001) in this cohort of head and neck cancer patients. Psychometric evaluation indicates that the scale could be used as an outcome measure between groups at one point in time, but future research is needed to establish the scale's sensitivity to positive and negative changes in functional status for longitudinal studies.
生存率的提高和疾病的控制表明,有必要对头颈部癌治疗后的生活质量进行评估。通过对115名患者的访谈开发了一种针对特定疾病的测量方法,各项条目反映了患者用于描述与治疗相关问题和担忧的术语。对172名头颈部癌患者以及30名患有乳腺癌和妇科癌症的患者测试了这种自我报告量表的效度和信度。区分效度极佳。该量表的聚合效度通过与一般健康状况测量指标的皮尔逊相关系数为0.68、与卡诺夫斯基功能状态量表的相关系数为0.68以及与头颈部癌患者功能状态量表的相关系数为0.76得以证明。用克朗巴赫α系数衡量的信度为0.88。方差分析表明,在这组头颈部癌患者中,该量表对疾病分期(p = 0.017)和首次手术范围(p = 0.001)的差异敏感。心理测量学评估表明,该量表可在某一时刻用作组间结局测量指标,但需要未来的研究来确定该量表对纵向研究中功能状态正负变化的敏感性。