Werner H, Firsching R, Krasemann C
Infection. 1977;5(1):13-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01639103.
The activity of the new cephamycin C derivatives cefoxitin against 102 clinical isolates of Bacteroidaceae (95 Bacteroides strains and 7 Fusobacterium-Sphaerophorus cultures) was determined by tube dilution and standardized agar diffusion tests and compared to that of cephalothin. Cefoxitin was more active than cephalothin against 56 Bacteroides fragilis strains, 19 Bacteroides thetaiota-omicron strains and two Bacteroides splanchnicus strains. The difference seemed less pronounced with five Bacteroides vulgatus and four Bacteroides variabilis cultures. Three Bacteroides melaninogenicus and six Bacteroides oralis strains displayed similar sensitivity to both cephalosporins. At concentrations of 32 microng/ml or less, cefoxitin inhibited 91% and cephalothin 33% of the Bacteroides strains. Two strains of Sphaerophorus varius were likewise much more sensitive to cefoxitin than to cephalothin (MIC values 8 micron8/ml of cefoxitin and 256 microng/ml of cephalothin). Three other Sphaerophorus strains (the species necrophorus and freundii/mortiferum) and two of Fusobacterium fusiforme (Fusobacterium nucleatum) strains were very similar in their susceptibility to both cephalosporins. Statistical analysis of the relationship between MIC and zone size diameter showed relatively high correlation coefficients for cefoxitin and cephalothin (r=-0.741 and r=-0.703 respectively).
通过试管稀释法和标准化琼脂扩散试验,测定了新型头孢西丁C衍生物头孢西丁对102株拟杆菌科临床分离株(95株拟杆菌菌株和7株梭杆菌-球形梭菌培养物)的活性,并与头孢噻吩进行了比较。头孢西丁对56株脆弱拟杆菌菌株、19株多形拟杆菌菌株和2株内脏拟杆菌菌株的活性比头孢噻吩更强。在5株普通拟杆菌和4株可变拟杆菌培养物中,这种差异似乎不太明显。3株产黑色素拟杆菌和6株口腔拟杆菌菌株对两种头孢菌素的敏感性相似。在浓度为32微克/毫升或更低时,头孢西丁抑制了91%的拟杆菌菌株,而头孢噻吩抑制了33%。两株可变球形梭菌同样对头孢西丁比对头孢噻吩更敏感(头孢西丁的MIC值为8微克/毫升,头孢噻吩为256微克/毫升)。另外3株球形梭菌菌株(坏死梭菌和弗氏/致死梭菌)和2株具核梭杆菌菌株对两种头孢菌素的敏感性非常相似。对MIC和抑菌圈直径之间关系的统计分析表明头孢西丁和头孢噻吩的相关系数相对较高(分别为r = -0.741和r = -0.703)。