Suppr超能文献

厌氧菌:四种头孢菌素药敏纸片的评估

Anaerobic bacteria: evaluation of disc susceptibility to four cephalosporins.

作者信息

Dubois J, Pechère J C

出版信息

Infection. 1978;6(6):266-70. doi: 10.1007/BF01641985.

Abstract

The disc diffusion technique was evaluated with 178 strains of anaerobes and four cephalosporins (cephalothin, cefamandole, cefazolin and cefoxitin). Good correlation in results was found in comparison with the agar dilution technique (p less than 0.001) with the exception of cefamandole and cefazolin against anaerobic cocci (p greater than 0.05). Choosing a breakpoint of 8 microgram/ml for distinguishing susceptible and resistant strains, we determined corresponding incubation, the rate of error is less than 1% for false susceptible and less than 5% for false resistant. However, some strains of anaerobic cocci required a 48 hour incubation period for allowing visible growth. Moreover, a great deal (60.5%) of overlapping zone diameters made interpretation of disc diffusion test difficult among Bacteroides fragilis strains classed as susceptible, intermediate and resistant occuring with cefoxitin. The results have shown that the cephalothin disk will not accurately predict susceptibility of B. fragilis to cefoxitin.

摘要

采用纸片扩散法,用178株厌氧菌和4种头孢菌素(头孢噻吩、头孢孟多、头孢唑林和头孢西丁)进行评估。与琼脂稀释法相比,结果具有良好的相关性(p小于0.001),但头孢孟多和头孢唑林对厌氧球菌除外(p大于0.05)。选择8微克/毫升的折点来区分敏感和耐药菌株,我们确定了相应的孵育时间,假敏感的错误率小于1%,假耐药的错误率小于5%。然而,一些厌氧球菌菌株需要48小时的孵育期才能出现可见生长。此外,在被分类为对头孢西丁敏感、中介和耐药的脆弱拟杆菌菌株中,大量(60.5%)的抑菌圈直径重叠使得纸片扩散试验的结果判读困难。结果表明,头孢噻吩纸片不能准确预测脆弱拟杆菌对头孢西丁的敏感性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验