Helmerhorst F M, Oei S G, Bloemenkamp K W, Keirse M J
Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Leiden University Hospital, The Netherlands.
Hum Reprod. 1995 Aug;10(8):2027-30. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136230.
A questionnaire survey among the teaching departments of obstetrics and gynaecology in Western Europe (response rate 71%) revealed only weak adherence to the World Health Organization recommendations for the standard investigation of the infertile couple. Both general and specific examinations were applied more frequently in the female than in the male partner. Although semen analysis and the ascertainment of ovulation were standard in virtually all departments, the criteria for normal semen and the methods used for the detection of ovulation varied greatly among both departments and countries. There were also large differences among countries in the preferred standard method for testing tubal patency. The data suggest that fertility investigations are based more on tradition and personal preferences than on the demonstrated utility of its components.
一项针对西欧妇产科教学部门的问卷调查(回复率71%)显示,对世界卫生组织关于不育夫妇标准检查的建议的遵循程度很低。无论是一般检查还是特殊检查,在女性伴侣身上的应用都比男性伴侣更为频繁。尽管几乎所有部门都将精液分析和排卵测定作为标准检查,但各部门和各国之间,正常精液的标准以及检测排卵的方法差异很大。在检测输卵管通畅性的首选标准方法上,各国之间也存在很大差异。数据表明,生育力检查更多地基于传统和个人偏好,而非其各项检查已证实的效用。