Oei S G, Keirse M J, Bloemenkamp K W, Helmerhorst F M
Departmentof Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Leiden University Hospital, The Netherlands.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Aug;102(8):621-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11399.x.
To assess differences in opinion and practice with regard to the postcoital test in Europe.
Multilingual questionnaire survey among heads of departments of obstetrics and gynaecology with large fertility clinics in 16 European countries.
Of 203 heads of departments, each responsible for 882 infertility cases per year (95% CI 657-1107) 145 (71%) responded. INFORMATION SOUGHT: Use of the postcoital test: its timing in relation to cycle and coitus, methodology used for the test, cut-off level of normality and treatments applied for abnormal test results.
The postcoital test is used in 92% (and routinely in 68%) of departments. There are large differences in timing of the test in relation to menstrual cycle and coitus, in microscopic magnification used, and in cut-off levels of normality. More than 10 different treatments are applied for abnormal test results.
Guidelines of the World Health Organisation are not followed and divergence in practice and opinion is wide enough to question whether infertile couples are better off with than without the test.
评估欧洲在性交后试验方面的观点和实践差异。
对16个欧洲国家大型生育诊所的妇产科主任进行多语言问卷调查。
203位科室主任,每人每年负责882例不孕症病例(95%置信区间657 - 1107),145位(71%)做出了回应。调查内容:性交后试验的使用情况:其与月经周期和性交的时间关系、试验所采用的方法、正常的临界值以及针对异常试验结果所采用的治疗方法。
92%的科室使用性交后试验(68%为常规使用)。在试验与月经周期和性交的时间关系、所使用的显微镜放大倍数以及正常临界值方面存在很大差异。针对异常试验结果采用了10多种不同的治疗方法。
未遵循世界卫生组织的指南,实践和观点的差异很大,足以让人质疑不孕夫妇进行该试验是否比不进行更好。