Suppr超能文献

欧洲性交后试验:观点与实践

European postcoital tests: opinions and practice.

作者信息

Oei S G, Keirse M J, Bloemenkamp K W, Helmerhorst F M

机构信息

Departmentof Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Leiden University Hospital, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Aug;102(8):621-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11399.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess differences in opinion and practice with regard to the postcoital test in Europe.

DESIGN

Multilingual questionnaire survey among heads of departments of obstetrics and gynaecology with large fertility clinics in 16 European countries.

SUBJECTS

Of 203 heads of departments, each responsible for 882 infertility cases per year (95% CI 657-1107) 145 (71%) responded. INFORMATION SOUGHT: Use of the postcoital test: its timing in relation to cycle and coitus, methodology used for the test, cut-off level of normality and treatments applied for abnormal test results.

RESULTS

The postcoital test is used in 92% (and routinely in 68%) of departments. There are large differences in timing of the test in relation to menstrual cycle and coitus, in microscopic magnification used, and in cut-off levels of normality. More than 10 different treatments are applied for abnormal test results.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines of the World Health Organisation are not followed and divergence in practice and opinion is wide enough to question whether infertile couples are better off with than without the test.

摘要

目的

评估欧洲在性交后试验方面的观点和实践差异。

设计

对16个欧洲国家大型生育诊所的妇产科主任进行多语言问卷调查。

研究对象

203位科室主任,每人每年负责882例不孕症病例(95%置信区间657 - 1107),145位(71%)做出了回应。调查内容:性交后试验的使用情况:其与月经周期和性交的时间关系、试验所采用的方法、正常的临界值以及针对异常试验结果所采用的治疗方法。

结果

92%的科室使用性交后试验(68%为常规使用)。在试验与月经周期和性交的时间关系、所使用的显微镜放大倍数以及正常临界值方面存在很大差异。针对异常试验结果采用了10多种不同的治疗方法。

结论

未遵循世界卫生组织的指南,实践和观点的差异很大,足以让人质疑不孕夫妇进行该试验是否比不进行更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验