Miller S D, Wetzig R P, Claman H N
J Exp Med. 1979 Mar 1;149(3):758-73. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.3.758.
A mouse model of cell-mediated immunity (CMI) and tolerance to protein antigens horse gamma globulin (HoGG) and cytochrome (Cyt C) was investigated. A reliable CMI response as measured in vivo by ear swelling or by an in vitro T-cell proliferation assay could be induced by one of two methods: (a) sensitization by antigen-complete Freund's adjuvant in the base of the tail, or (b) sensitization by s.c. injection of antigen coupled to syngeneic lymphoid cells. The in vivo response exhibited characteristic CMI parameters, delayed kinetics, and transfer by viable T cells. Prior i.v. injection of HoGG-modified lymphoid cells (HoGG-LC) or Cyt C-LC before sensitization resulted in a rapidly induced, dose-dependent, antigen-specific suppression of both in vivo and in vitro manifestations of the CMI response. In addition, tolerance in this system was transferrable by an antigen-specific suppressor T cell (Ts). The Ts were found to diminish the in vivo ear swelling reaction in recipient animals, but had no effect on the in vitro T-cell proliferative response of the recipients. In contrast to the rapid development of tolerance in donor mice (phenotypic tolerance), transferrable Ts were first demonstrable 4--7 d posttolerization. This latter result indicates that at least two mechanisms of tolerance are operative in this system: the rapid induction of clone inhibition of reactive T cells and the slower induction of Ts. These results indicate again that the mode of antigen presentation is crucial in determining the immunologic outcome. In these experiments, cell-bound proteins injected subcutaneously led to delayed hypersensitivity while the same antigens injected intravenously led to tolerance. These results are considered in the light of recent experiments which show that T cells recognize antigens on cells in association with major histocompatibility complex products. We believe the following pathways are involved. In sensitization via subcutaneous injection of HoGG-LC, antigen reaches the lymph node via lymphatic pathways which lead to immunogenic macrophage-associated presentation and the activation of delayed hypersensitivity T cells (TDH). In tolerization via intravenous injection of HoGG-LC, antigen (a) reaches the lymph node via the blood, probably directly meeting the TDH, preventing its subsequent activation by immunogenic HoGG (clone inhibition) and (b) reaches the spleen, also via the blood, activating suppressor T cells.
研究了细胞介导免疫(CMI)以及对蛋白质抗原马γ球蛋白(HoGG)和细胞色素(Cyt C)的耐受性的小鼠模型。可通过以下两种方法之一诱导出可靠的CMI反应,该反应可通过体内耳部肿胀或体外T细胞增殖试验来测量:(a)在尾根部用抗原 - 完全弗氏佐剂致敏,或(b)通过皮下注射与同基因淋巴细胞偶联的抗原来致敏。体内反应表现出典型的CMI参数、延迟动力学以及活T细胞介导的转移。在致敏前静脉注射HoGG修饰的淋巴细胞(HoGG - LC)或Cyt C - LC会导致CMI反应的体内和体外表现迅速被诱导、呈剂量依赖性且具有抗原特异性的抑制。此外,该系统中的耐受性可由抗原特异性抑制性T细胞(Ts)转移。发现Ts可减轻受体动物体内的耳部肿胀反应,但对受体的体外T细胞增殖反应没有影响。与供体小鼠中耐受性的快速形成(表型耐受性)相反,可转移的Ts在耐受诱导后4 - 7天才首次被证实。后一结果表明该系统中至少有两种耐受性机制起作用:反应性T细胞克隆抑制的快速诱导和Ts的较慢诱导。这些结果再次表明抗原呈递方式在决定免疫结果方面至关重要。在这些实验中,皮下注射细胞结合蛋白会导致迟发型超敏反应,而静脉注射相同抗原则会导致耐受性。根据最近的实验来考虑这些结果,这些实验表明T细胞识别与主要组织相容性复合体产物相关的细胞上的抗原。我们认为涉及以下途径。在通过皮下注射HoGG - LC致敏过程中,抗原通过淋巴途径到达淋巴结,这会导致免疫原性巨噬细胞相关的呈递以及迟发型超敏T细胞(TDH)的激活。在通过静脉注射HoGG - LC诱导耐受过程中,抗原(a)通过血液到达淋巴结,可能直接与TDH相遇,阻止其随后被免疫原性HoGG激活(克隆抑制),并且(b)也通过血液到达脾脏,激活抑制性T细胞。