Tucker D M, McEachern M
Department of Radiology, University of Alabama Hospital and Clinics, Birmingham, USA.
J Digit Imaging. 1995 Nov;8(4):162-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03168715.
Most radiology departments have established quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) programs for conventional film-based image management systems. At many institutions, digital image management systems, or picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), are replacing part or all of the film management system. In these situations, it is important to control the quality of the digital images that are produced. The observed frequency of eight types of image-related errors occurring on an image viewing station located in a medical intensive care unit is reported. Images on the viewing station were checked for 12 consecutive weeks. Film images available in the radiology reading room and digital images on the viewing station were compared with a list of completed examinations produced by the radiological information system. Overall, 1,082 patient examinations were encountered. Seventy-six images (7.02% of all images) were observed with errors. In addition, four previously unencountered types of errors were observed in 11 images (1.01% of all images). The majority of the errors are attributed to interfaces either between information systems or between the PACS and the user. It is concluded that QA-QC procedures are necessary for PACS, and that good interfaces, both between information systems and between humans and computer systems, are essential for successful PACS implementations.
大多数放射科已为传统的基于胶片的图像管理系统建立了质量保证(QA)和质量控制(QC)程序。在许多机构中,数字图像管理系统,即图像存档与通信系统(PACS),正在取代部分或全部胶片管理系统。在这些情况下,控制所产生数字图像的质量很重要。本文报告了在一个医学重症监护病房的图像查看站上出现的八种与图像相关错误的观察频率。对查看站上的图像连续检查了12周。将放射科阅片室中的胶片图像和查看站上的数字图像与放射信息系统生成的已完成检查列表进行了比较。总体而言,共遇到1082例患者检查。观察到76幅图像(占所有图像的7.02%)存在错误。此外,在11幅图像(占所有图像的1.01%)中观察到四种以前未遇到过的错误类型。大多数错误归因于信息系统之间或PACS与用户之间的接口。得出的结论是,PACS需要QA-QC程序,并且信息系统之间以及人与计算机系统之间的良好接口对于PACS的成功实施至关重要。