Kraus B B, Ros P R, Abbitt P L, Kerns S R, Sabatelli F W
Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610-0374, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1995 Sep-Oct;5(5):571-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880050517.
To compare ultrasound (US), CT, and MRI in the evaluation of hepatic vascular anatomy, portal and splenic venous flow, and collateral pathways (varices and spontaneous shunts) in candidates for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS), 17 patients with history of refractory variceal bleeding or intractable ascites underwent duplex US, contrast-enhanced CT, and MRI before TIPS. The appearance of portal and hepatic anatomy was graded from 1 (not visible) to 4 (excellent visualization) independently by four radiologists. Presence and direction of portal and splenic venous flow, and presence and location of varices and spontaneous portosystemic shunts were also assessed. Results and effects of interobserver variation were assessed for significance using Friedman's ANOVA and Wilcoxon's signed-rank test. MRI yielded higher scores than CT or US for hepatic veins (P < .0001) and inferior vena cava (P < .0001). MRI and CT scored better than US for portal vein branches (P = .012) and splenic vein (P = .0038). All tests demonstrated the main portal vein well, with no statistically significant difference. US and MRI were more sensitive than CT for detecting portal vein flow and direction (US 76%, CT 0%, MRI 82%). MRI was most sensitive for splenic vein flow and direction (US 41%, CT 0%, MRI 76%). CT and MRI were more sensitive than US in detecting varices (US 5%, CT 50%, MRI 58%) and spontaneous shunts (US 13%, CT 75%, MRI 75%). Interobserver variation did not influence results significantly P = .3691). MRI provides the most useful information and may be the preferred single imaging test prior to TIPS.
为比较超声(US)、CT和MRI在经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)候选者肝血管解剖结构、门静脉和脾静脉血流以及侧支循环途径(静脉曲张和自发性分流)评估中的作用,17例有难治性静脉曲张出血或顽固性腹水病史的患者在TIPS术前接受了双功超声、增强CT和MRI检查。由四位放射科医生独立将门静脉和肝部解剖结构的显示情况从1级(不可见)到4级(极佳显示)进行分级。还评估了门静脉和脾静脉血流的存在及方向,以及静脉曲张和自发性门体分流的存在及位置。使用Friedman方差分析和Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估观察者间差异的结果和影响的显著性。MRI在肝静脉(P <.0001)和下腔静脉(P <.0001)方面的评分高于CT或US。MRI和CT在门静脉分支(P =.012)和脾静脉(P =.0038)方面的评分优于US。所有检查对门静脉主干的显示均良好,无统计学显著差异。在检测门静脉血流和方向方面,US和MRI比CT更敏感(US 76%,CT 0%,MRI 82%)。MRI对脾静脉血流和方向最敏感(US 41%,CT 0%,MRI 76%)。在检测静脉曲张(US 5%,CT 50%,MRI 58%)和自发性分流(US 13%,CT 75%,MRI 75%)方面,CT和MRI比US更敏感。观察者间差异对结果无显著影响(P =.3691)。MRI提供了最有用的信息,可能是TIPS术前首选的单一影像学检查。