McConnell E A
Meriter Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Biomed Instrum Technol. 1995 Nov-Dec;29(6):520-6.
Registered nurses (N = 106) working at a 500-bed tertiary care center in a medium-sized midwestern city on units with high levels of usage of both indwelling urethral (Foley) catheters and intravenous infusion pumps were surveyed to compare how and what they had learned about the simple compared with the complex devices they used in direct patient care, and the consequences of simple vs complex device use for both patients and staff nurses. The participants were significantly more likely to have learned to use the indwelling urethral catheter in nursing school than they were to have learned how to use an intravenous infusion pump in nursing school. Staff nurses differed significantly on most (12 of 17) items about what they had learned and were more likely to have learned about various features of the indwelling urethral catheter than about the infusion pump. The participants were significantly more likely to feel stressed when using an intravenous infusion pump than when using an indwelling urethral catheter, but were significantly more likely to have used an indwelling urethral catheter that caused a patient harm than an intravenous infusion pump that caused a patient harm.
在中西部一个中等规模城市的一家拥有500张床位的三级护理中心工作的注册护士(N = 106),对其所在使用留置导尿管(Foley导管)和静脉输液泵使用率较高的科室进行了调查,以比较他们如何以及学到了哪些关于在直接护理患者中使用的简单设备与复杂设备的知识,以及使用简单和复杂设备对患者和护士的影响。与在护理学校学习如何使用静脉输液泵相比,参与者在护理学校学习使用留置导尿管的可能性显著更高。在关于所学内容的大多数(17项中的12项)项目上,护士之间存在显著差异,并且他们更有可能了解留置导尿管的各种特征而非输液泵的特征。与使用留置导尿管相比,参与者在使用静脉输液泵时明显更容易感到压力,但使用导致患者伤害的留置导尿管的可能性显著高于使用导致患者伤害的静脉输液泵。