Mahoney M J
Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton 76203-3587, USA.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1995 Sep;26(3):275-8. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(95)00030-4.
Arguments that thoughts cannot have the power to cause or influence behavior are briefly addressed. Despite being couched in traditional behavioristic terminology, some of these arguments actually invoke the very dualism that they criticize. Likewise problematic are portrayals of scientific activity as being necessarily grounded in an ontology of physical extension and an epistemology that grants the visual system (and hence observability) sole and supreme authority. Contemporary cognitivists challenge classical mind-body dualism and refer to thoughts and other "mental" phenomena as activities of the living system. Three conclusions are drawn: (1) humans think, (2) human thinking influences human behavior, and vice-versa, and (3) dialogues on this topic would be well served by a refinement of the questions under consideration.
本文简要讨论了认为思想没有能力引发或影响行为的观点。尽管这些观点是用传统行为主义术语表述的,但其中一些观点实际上援引了它们所批评的二元论。同样存在问题的是,将科学活动描绘为必然基于物理延展的本体论和赋予视觉系统(从而可观察性)唯一和至高无上权威的认识论。当代认知主义者挑战经典的心身二元论,并将思想和其他“心理”现象视为生命系统的活动。得出了三个结论:(1)人类会思考,(2)人类思维会影响人类行为,反之亦然,(3)对这一主题的对话将因对所考虑问题的细化而得到很好的促进。