Spaulding W D
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 68588-0308, USA.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1995 Sep;26(3):279-82. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(95)00032-u.
The debate about the causal efficacy of cognition involves two overlapping but different issues: (1) whether explanatory fictions improve upon the power and utility of nonfictional explanations of behavior, and (2) whether any explanation, either purely empirical or purely inferential, can describe proximal causality in behavioral functioning. The resolution of the first issue depends on the purpose to which the explanation is to be put. The resolution of the second issue depends on the larger paradigmatic context in which causality is understood. In modern biosystemic models of behavior, linear causality is important only as a special case of the multidirectional and reciprocal causality which characterizes complex self-regulating systems.
(1)解释性虚构是否比行为的非虚构解释的力量和效用有所改进,以及(2)任何解释,无论是纯粹经验性的还是纯粹推断性的,是否能够描述行为功能中的近端因果关系。第一个问题的解决取决于解释所要达成的目的。第二个问题的解决取决于理解因果关系的更大的范式背景。在现代行为生物系统模型中,线性因果关系仅作为复杂自我调节系统所特有的多向和相互因果关系的一个特例才重要。