Orehek J, Grimaud C, Charpin J
Ann Allergy. 1977 May;38(5):357-60.
Spirometric indices such as the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the maximal expiratory flow rate (MEFR) and the maximal midexpiratory flow rate (MMFR) can be criticized for use with bronchial provocation tests since they are either partly effort-dependent or dependent on the forced vital capacity (FVC). These criticisms can be avoided by the use of a new index corresponding to the volume of air expired in one second starting at 75% of the control FVC, called the (FEV1)-25. This study was performed to evaluate the relative sensitivity of the (FEV1)-25 and the classical FEV1 in detecting airway obstruction caused by an inhaled carbachol aerosol in 20 asthmatic subjects. The mean fall in (FEV1)-25 of 46% following carbachol inhalation compared with a mean fall in FEV1 of 35% indicates that, in addition to its theoretical advantages, the (FEV1)-25 is a sensitive index for use with bronchial provocation tests.
诸如一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、最大呼气流量(MEFR)和最大呼气中期流量(MMFR)等肺量计指标用于支气管激发试验时可能会受到批评,因为它们要么部分依赖于用力程度,要么依赖于用力肺活量(FVC)。通过使用一种新的指标可以避免这些批评,该指标对应于从对照FVC的75%开始一秒内呼出的空气量,称为(FEV1)-25。本研究旨在评估(FEV1)-25和经典FEV1在检测20名哮喘患者吸入卡巴胆碱气雾剂引起的气道阻塞方面的相对敏感性。吸入卡巴胆碱后,(FEV1)-25平均下降46%,而FEV1平均下降35%,这表明(FEV1)-25除了具有理论优势外,还是一种用于支气管激发试验的敏感指标。