Jaffrin M Y
Department of Biological Engineering, Technological University of Compiègne, France.
Artif Organs. 1995 Nov;19(11):1162-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1995.tb02277.x.
Convective mass transfer in hemodialysis is associated with ultrafiltration (UF). In the absence of diffusion as in hemofiltration, the convective clearance is equal to S.QF where S is the apparent solute sieving coefficient and QF the UF flow rate, but the convective contribution significantly decreases when diffusion is present. A rigorous calculation of the combined diffusion-convection mass transfer for partially rejected solutes is very complex. In this paper we review various models of mass fluxes found in the literature. Since all these models express the mass flux through the membrane as a linear function of blood and dialysate concentrations with different coefficients, we present a general expression for the hemodiafiltration clearance combining diffusion and convection which can be adapted to each model of mass flux. A surprising result is that the convective contribution to the clearance is, in the limit of dominant ultrafiltration, independent of the solute sieving coefficient, in contrast to the model of Villaroel et al. This is due to the effect of increased solute concentration at the membrane which compensates exactly for the effect of the sieving coefficient. This effect is overlooked in the Villaroel et al. model which assumes well mixed blood and dialysate compartments. Comparison with in vitro clearance measurements for urea, creatinin, vitamin B12, and myoglobin (16,000 daltons) supports this observation even when diffusion dominates as in the case of clinical conditions for hemodiafiltration. An empirical correlation for the overall clearance valid for all solutes and blood flows between 200 and 500 ml/min is found to be K = KD + 0.43 QF + 8.3 x 10(-3) Q2F when clearances and QF are in ml/min.
血液透析中的对流质量传递与超滤(UF)相关。在不存在扩散的情况下,如血液滤过,对流清除率等于S·QF,其中S是表观溶质筛系数,QF是超滤流速,但当存在扩散时,对流贡献会显著降低。对于部分被截留溶质的扩散 - 对流联合质量传递进行严格计算非常复杂。在本文中,我们回顾了文献中发现的各种质量通量模型。由于所有这些模型都将通过膜的质量通量表示为血液和透析液浓度的线性函数,只是系数不同,我们给出了一个结合扩散和对流的血液透析滤过清除率的通用表达式,它可以适用于每种质量通量模型。一个令人惊讶的结果是,在超滤占主导的极限情况下,对流对清除率的贡献与溶质筛系数无关,这与Villaroel等人的模型不同。这是由于膜处溶质浓度增加的效应恰好补偿了筛系数的效应。Villaroel等人的模型忽略了这种效应,该模型假设血液和透析液隔室充分混合。与尿素、肌酐、维生素B12和肌红蛋白(16,000道尔顿)的体外清除率测量结果相比,即使在血液透析滤过的临床条件下扩散占主导时,也支持了这一观察结果。当清除率和QF以ml/min为单位时,发现对于所有溶质和200至500ml/min之间的血流,总清除率的经验相关性为K = KD + 0.43 QF + 8.3 x 10(-3) Q2F 。