Li G X, Yan Y, Yuan J S
First Affiliated Hospital and Specialists Clinics, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang.
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 1995 Aug;15(8):472-5.
By virtue of a diagnostic study of 781 cases on the basis of six standards, it was shown that for the effectiveness in diagnostic positive rate, sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate, false negative rate and comprehensive scoring, the International Diagnostic Standards for Blood Stasis Syndrome (BSS) and Chinese Diagnostic Standards for BSS were the best ones, BSS Eye-Signs and Japanese BSS Diagnostic Standards were the second, trial program of International Stasis Diagnostic Standards and Zhongshan's BSS tenderness points came the third. Each standard has its unique advantage and therefore, we should take the other's advantage to offset one's weakness. The causes of their weakness have been discussed and the rational recommendation for their application has been proposed.
通过依据六项标准对781例病例进行诊断研究，结果表明，在诊断阳性率、敏感度、特异度、假阳性率、假阴性率及综合评分的有效性方面，国际血瘀证诊断标准和中国血瘀证诊断标准最佳，血瘀证眼征诊断标准和日本血瘀证诊断标准次之，国际血瘀诊断标准试行方案和中山血瘀证压痛点诊断标准位列第三。各标准都有其独特优势，因此，应取长补短。文中探讨了它们存在不足的原因，并对其应用提出了合理建议。
