Zurbriggen A, Graber H U, Vandevelde M
Institute of Animal Neurology, University of Berne, Switzerland.
Vet Microbiol. 1995 May;44(2-4):281-8. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(95)00022-3.
In primary dog brain cell cultures (DBCC) the attenuated canine distemper virus (CDV) is cytolytic, whereas virulent CDV is not. Thus, the question why cytolysis does or does not occur appears to be intimately associated with the mechanism of persistence. Persistence is most likely related to the way these viruses replicate. In the present study we used morphological and immunocytochemical approaches to compare several aspects of virus replication between a cytolytic and a virulent CDV strain using DBCC to study both strains. Quantitative measurements did not detect a difference in the rate of virus protein synthesis at the level of the single cell, between the two types of infection. Electron microscopical results and virus titration experiments showed marked differences in virus spread and virus release. Immunocytochemical studies showed differences in the distribution of the nucleocapsid and matrix proteins between the two infections. Budding and cytolysis are strongly limited in the virulent A75/17-CDV infection as compared to attenuated viruses. This is probably due to structural changes in the virus proteins leading to modifications of virus assembly. Thus the present study supports a mechanism of CDV persistence through a type of virus maturation and spread by which very little virus is released outside of the cell.
在原代犬脑细胞培养物(DBCC)中,减毒犬瘟热病毒(CDV)具有细胞溶解性,而强毒CDV则没有。因此,细胞溶解为何发生或不发生的问题似乎与持续性机制密切相关。持续性很可能与这些病毒的复制方式有关。在本研究中,我们使用形态学和免疫细胞化学方法,利用DBCC来研究两种毒株,比较了溶细胞性和强毒CDV毒株之间病毒复制的几个方面。定量测量未检测到两种感染类型在单细胞水平上病毒蛋白合成速率的差异。电子显微镜结果和病毒滴定实验显示病毒传播和病毒释放存在显著差异。免疫细胞化学研究表明两种感染之间核衣壳和基质蛋白的分布存在差异。与减毒病毒相比,强毒A75/17 - CDV感染中的出芽和细胞溶解受到强烈限制。这可能是由于病毒蛋白的结构变化导致病毒组装的改变。因此,本研究支持一种通过某种病毒成熟和传播机制实现CDV持续性的观点,即很少有病毒释放到细胞外。