Suppr超能文献

[从德国法院管辖权角度看所谓的专家地位]

[The so-called specialist status from the viewpoint of jurisdiction of the German court of justice].

作者信息

Steffen E

机构信息

Bundesgerichtshof, Karlsruhe.

出版信息

Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Nov;89(6):595-7.

PMID:8588429
Abstract

As long as the resident as a physician in training does not have the knowledge of a specialist, he has to be accompanied by a specialist (i.e., during surgical procedures). Is there a lack of such company, the onus of proof, that a failure is not due to the lack of specialist's quality, is on the side of the therapist. If this proof can be given, the question about specialist or not specialist is off the table (this is also true for the court of justice).

摘要

只要住院医师作为培训中的医生不具备专科医生的知识,他就必须有专科医生陪同(例如,在外科手术过程中)。如果缺乏这种陪同,证明失败不是由于专科医生资质不足的举证责任就在治疗师一方。如果能够给出这种证明,那么关于是否为专科医生的问题就不再讨论(这对司法法庭来说也是如此)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验