Suppr超能文献

[从德国法院管辖权角度看所谓的专家地位]

[The so-called specialist status from the viewpoint of jurisdiction of the German court of justice].

作者信息

Steffen E

机构信息

Bundesgerichtshof, Karlsruhe.

出版信息

Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Nov;89(6):595-7.

PMID:8588429
Abstract

As long as the resident as a physician in training does not have the knowledge of a specialist, he has to be accompanied by a specialist (i.e., during surgical procedures). Is there a lack of such company, the onus of proof, that a failure is not due to the lack of specialist's quality, is on the side of the therapist. If this proof can be given, the question about specialist or not specialist is off the table (this is also true for the court of justice).

摘要

只要住院医师作为培训中的医生不具备专科医生的知识,他就必须有专科医生陪同(例如,在外科手术过程中)。如果缺乏这种陪同,证明失败不是由于专科医生资质不足的举证责任就在治疗师一方。如果能够给出这种证明,那么关于是否为专科医生的问题就不再讨论(这对司法法庭来说也是如此)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验