Safran C, Rind D M, Davis R B, Sands D Z, Caraballo E, Rippel K, Wang Q, Rury C, Makadon H J, Cotton D J
Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Hospital, Center for Clinical Computing, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA.
Medinfo. 1995;8 Pt 2:1076-80.
To meet the needs of primary care physicians caring for patients with HIV infection, we developed a knowledge-based medical record to allow the on-line patient record to play an active role in the care process. These programs integrate the on-line patient record, rule-based decision support, and full-text information retrieval into a clinical workstation for the practicing clinician. To determine whether use of a knowledge-based medical record was associated with more rapid and complete adherence to practice guidelines and improved quality of care, we performed a controlled clinical trial among physicians and nurse practitioners caring for 349 patients infected with the human immuno-deficiency virus (HIV); 191 patients were treated by 65 physicians and nurse practitioners assigned to the intervention group, and 158 patients were treated by 61 physicians and nurse practitioners assigned to the control group. During the 18-month study period, the computer generated 303 alerts in the intervention group and 388 in the control group. The median response time of clinicians to these alerts was 11 days in the intervention group and 52 days in the control group (PJJ0.0001, log-rank test). During the study, the computer generated 432 primary care reminders for the intervention group and 360 reminders for the control group. The median response time of clinicians to these alerts was 114 days in the intervention group and more than 500 days in the control group (PJJ0.0001, log-rank test). Of the 191 patients in the intervention group, 67 (35%) had one or more hospitalizations, compared with 70 (44%) of the 158 patients in the control group (PJ=J0.04, Wilcoxon test stratified for initial CD4 count). There was no difference in survival between the intervention and control groups (P = 0.18, log-rank test). We conclude that our clinical workstation significantly changed physicians' behavior in terms of their response to alerts regarding primary care interventions and that these interventions have led to fewer patients with HIV infection being admitted to the hospital.
为满足基层医疗医生护理艾滋病毒感染患者的需求,我们开发了一种基于知识的病历,以使在线患者记录在护理过程中发挥积极作用。这些程序将在线患者记录、基于规则的决策支持和全文信息检索集成到一个供执业临床医生使用的临床工作站中。为了确定使用基于知识的病历是否与更快、更全面地遵守实践指南以及改善护理质量相关,我们在护理349名人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染患者的医生和执业护士中进行了一项对照临床试验;191名患者由分配到干预组的65名医生和执业护士治疗,158名患者由分配到对照组的61名医生和执业护士治疗。在为期18个月的研究期间,计算机在干预组生成了303条警报,在对照组生成了388条警报。临床医生对这些警报的中位响应时间在干预组为11天,在对照组为52天(P<0.0001,对数秩检验)。在研究期间,计算机为干预组生成了432条初级护理提醒,为对照组生成了360条提醒。临床医生对这些提醒的中位响应时间在干预组为114天,在对照组超过500天(P<0.0001,对数秩检验)。干预组的191名患者中,67名(35%)有一次或多次住院,而对照组的158名患者中有70名(44%)(P=0.04,按初始CD4计数分层的Wilcoxon检验)。干预组和对照组的生存率没有差异(P = 0.18,对数秩检验)。我们得出结论,我们的临床工作站在医生对初级护理干预警报的反应方面显著改变了他们的行为,并且这些干预导致感染艾滋病毒的住院患者减少。