Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚皇家全科医生学院认证考试的纵向信度

Longitudinal reliability of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners certification examination.

作者信息

Hays R B, van der Vleuten C, Fabb W E, Spike N A

机构信息

University of Queensland, Townsville, Australia.

出版信息

Med Educ. 1995 Jul;29(4):317-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1995.tb02855.x.

Abstract

The examination for Fellowship of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners is a long-standing examination that is regarded as a valid and comprehensive assessment of competence for general practice in Australia. Income and employment opportunities now depend on passing this battery of eight subtests. This paper describes the structures of the examination and reports an analysis of the reliability and efficiency of the examinations, based on data from five consecutive examinations. Results indicate that the examination achieves acceptable overall reliability, although suggestions for changes to improve reliability are made. A decision on implementing any changes must take into consideration any consequent changes in validity.

摘要

澳大利亚皇家全科医生学院院士资格考试是一项长期存在的考试,被视为对澳大利亚全科医疗能力的有效且全面的评估。现在,收入和就业机会取决于通过这一系列八门子测试。本文描述了该考试的结构,并基于连续五次考试的数据报告了对考试信度和效度的分析。结果表明,尽管提出了改进信度的更改建议,但该考试总体信度尚可接受。实施任何更改的决定都必须考虑随之而来的效度变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验