Tucker D M, Luu P, Pribram K H
Psychology Department, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403, USA.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995 Dec 15;769:213-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38141.x.
In humans, frontal lesions result in deficits of social and emotional behavior that are often surprising in the presence of intact language and other cognitive skills. The connections between the motivation and memory functions of limbic cortex and the motor planning functions of frontal neocortex must be fundamental to meeting the daily challenges of self-regulation. The connectional architecture of limbic and neocortical networks suggests a model of function. The densely interconnected paralimbic cortices may serve to maintain a global motivational context within which specific actions are articulated and sequenced within frontal neocortical networks. The paralimbic networks represent the visceral and kinesthetic information that is integral to the representation of the bodily self. In a general sense, the implicit self-representation within paralimbic networks may shape the significance of perceptions and the motivational context for developing actions. The network architecture of the frontal lobe reflects the dual limbic origins of frontal cortex, in the dorsal archicortical and ventral paleocortical structures. In this paper, we speculated that these two limbic-cortical pathways apply different motivational biases to direct the frontal lobe representation of working memory. The dorsal limbic mechanisms projecting through the cingulate gyrus may be influenced by hedonic evaluations, social attachments, and they may initiate a mode of motor control that is holistic and impulsive. In contrast, the ventral limbic pathway from the amygdala to orbital frontal cortex may implement a tight, restricted mode of motor control that reflects adaptive constraints of self-preservation. In the human brain, hemispheric specialization appears to have led to asymmetric elaborations of the dorsal and ventral pathways. Understanding the inherent asymmetries of corticolimbic architecture may be important in interpreting the increasing evidence that the left and right frontal lobes contribute differently to normal and pathological forms of self-regulation.
在人类中,额叶病变会导致社交和情感行为缺陷,而在语言和其他认知技能完好的情况下,这些缺陷往往令人惊讶。边缘皮层的动机和记忆功能与额叶新皮层的运动规划功能之间的联系,对于应对自我调节的日常挑战而言必定至关重要。边缘和新皮层网络的连接结构提示了一种功能模型。紧密相连的边缘旁皮层可能有助于维持一个整体的动机背景,在这个背景下,特定的动作在额叶新皮层网络中得以明确表达和排序。边缘旁网络代表了对身体自我表征不可或缺的内脏和动觉信息。从广义上讲,边缘旁网络中的内隐自我表征可能会塑造感知的意义以及行动发展的动机背景。额叶的网络结构反映了额叶皮层在背侧原皮质和腹侧古皮质结构中的双重边缘起源。在本文中,我们推测这两条边缘 - 皮层通路施加不同的动机偏差,以指导工作记忆在额叶的表征。通过扣带回投射的背侧边缘机制可能会受到享乐评估、社会依恋的影响,并且它们可能启动一种整体且冲动的运动控制模式。相比之下,从杏仁核到眶额皮层的腹侧边缘通路可能会实施一种紧密、受限的运动控制模式,这反映了自我保护的适应性限制。在人类大脑中,半球特化似乎导致了背侧和腹侧通路的不对称精细发展。理解皮质边缘结构的内在不对称性,对于解释越来越多的证据(即左右额叶对正常和病理性自我调节形式的贡献不同)可能很重要。