Morgane Peter J, Galler Janina R, Mokler David J
Department of Psychiatry, Center for Behavioral Development and Mental Retardation, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Prog Neurobiol. 2005 Feb;75(2):143-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.01.001.
Evolutionarily older brain systems, such as the limbic system, appear to serve fundamental aspects of emotional processing and provide relevant and motivational information for phylogenetically more recent brain systems to regulate complex behaviors. Overall, overt behavior is, in part, determined by the interactions of multiple learning and memory systems, some seemingly complementary and some actually competitive. An understanding of limbic system function in emotion and motivation requires that these subsystems be recognized and characterized as extended components of a distributed limbic network. Behavioral neuroscientists face the challenge of teasing apart the contributions of multiple overlapping neuronal systems in order to begin to elucidate the neural mechanisms of the limbic system and their contributions to behavior. One major consideration is to bring together conceptually the functions of individual components of the limbic forebrain and the related limbic midbrain systems. For example, in the rat the heterogeneous regions of the prefrontal cortex (e.g., prelimbic, anterior cingulate, subgenual cortices and orbito-frontal areas) make distinct contributions to emotional and motivational influences on behavior and each needs consideration in its own right. Major interacting structures of the limbic system include the prefrontal cortex, cingulate cortex, amygdaloid nuclear complex, limbic thalamus, hippocampal formation, nucleus accumbens (limbic striatum), anterior hypothalamus, ventral tegmental area and midbrain raphe nuclei; the latter comprising largely serotonergic components of the limbic midbrain system projecting to the forebrain. The posterior limbic midbrain complex comprising the stria medullaris, central gray and dorsal and ventral nuclei of Gudden are also key elements in the limbic midbrain. Some of these formations will be discussed in terms of the neurochemical connectivity between them. We put forward a systems approach in order to build a network model of the limbic forebrain/limbic midbrain system, and the interactions of its major components. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that the limbic system is both an anatomical entity as well as a physiological concept. We have considered this issue in detail in the introduction to this review. The components of these systems have usually been considered as functional units or 'centers' rather than being components of a larger, interacting, and distributed functional system. In that context, we are oriented toward considerations of distributed neural systems themselves as functional entities in the brain.
进化上较古老的脑系统,如边缘系统,似乎负责情绪加工的基本方面,并为进化上较新的脑系统提供相关的动机信息,以调节复杂行为。总体而言,公开行为部分取决于多个学习和记忆系统的相互作用,其中一些系统看似互补,而另一些实际上相互竞争。要理解边缘系统在情绪和动机方面的功能,需要将这些子系统识别并描述为分布式边缘网络的扩展组成部分。行为神经科学家面临着区分多个重叠神经元系统贡献的挑战,以便开始阐明边缘系统的神经机制及其对行为的贡献。一个主要的考虑因素是从概念上将边缘前脑的各个组成部分与相关的边缘中脑系统的功能整合在一起。例如,在大鼠中,前额叶皮质的不同区域(如前边缘区、前扣带回、膝下皮质和眶额叶区域)对行为的情绪和动机影响有不同的贡献,每个区域都需要单独考虑。边缘系统的主要相互作用结构包括前额叶皮质、扣带回皮质、杏仁核复合体、边缘丘脑、海马结构、伏隔核(边缘纹状体)、下丘脑前部、腹侧被盖区和中脑缝核;后者主要由投射到前脑的边缘中脑系统的5-羟色胺能成分组成。由髓纹、中央灰质以及古登背核和腹核组成的后边缘中脑复合体也是边缘中脑的关键要素。将根据它们之间的神经化学连接来讨论其中一些结构。我们提出一种系统方法,以便构建边缘前脑/边缘中脑系统及其主要组成部分相互作用的网络模型。在这方面,重要的是要记住,边缘系统既是一个解剖实体,也是一个生理概念。我们在本综述的引言中详细讨论了这个问题。这些系统的组成部分通常被视为功能单元或“中心”,而不是一个更大的、相互作用的分布式功能系统的组成部分。在这种背景下,我们倾向于将分布式神经系统本身视为大脑中的功能实体。