Sample sizes for studies using the short form 36 (SF-36).
作者信息
Julious S A, George S, Campbell M J
机构信息
Department of Medical Statistics and Computing, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital.
出版信息
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Dec;49(6):642-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.6.642.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Sample sizes for studies using the short form 36 (SF-36).使用简明健康状况调查问卷（SF - 36）的研究样本量。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Dec;49(6):642-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.6.642.
2
3
The Short-Form 36 and older people: some problems encountered when using postal administration.简明健康调查问卷（Short-Form 36）与老年人：邮政管理使用过程中遇到的一些问题
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 May;52(5):324-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.5.324.
4
Mapping the cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 to the preference-based EQ-5D, SF-6D, and 15D instruments.将癌症特异性 EORTC QLQ-C30 映射到偏好加权 EQ-5D、SF-6D 和 15D 工具。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1151-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00569.x. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
5
Assessing the health of women in prison: a study from the United Kingdom.评估监狱中女性的健康状况：一项来自英国的研究。
Health Care Women Int. 2005 Jan;26(1):62-8. doi: 10.1080/07399330590885768.
6
Comparing short form 6D, standard gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: results from total hip arthroplasty patients.比较简式6D、标准博弈法以及健康效用指数2级和3级的效用得分：全髋关节置换术患者的结果
Qual Life Res. 2004 Dec;13(10):1659-70. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-6189-2.
7
Beware the pitfalls of ill-placed questions - revisiting questionnaire ordering.谨防问题编排不当的陷阱——重新审视问卷顺序。
Soz Praventivmed. 2006;51(1):43-4. doi: 10.1007/s00038-005-0008-6.
8
The short form 36 health status questionnaire: clues from the Oxford region's normative data about its usefulness in measuring health gain in population surveys.36项简易健康状况调查问卷：来自牛津地区标准数据的线索，关于其在人口调查中衡量健康收益的有用性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Feb;49(1):102-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.1.102.
9
A comparison of Hong Kong and United Kingdom SF-6D health states valuations using a nonparametric Bayesian method.使用非参数贝叶斯方法对香港和英国 SF-6D 健康状态估值进行比较。
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 May 10.
10
SF-36 health status questionnaire.SF-36健康状况调查问卷。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Dec;49(6):647. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.6.647.
引用本文的文献
1
Khat chewing and health related quality of life: cross-sectional study in Jazan region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.阿拉伯沙特王国吉赞地区咀嚼恰特草与健康相关生活质量的横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Apr 4;12:44. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-44.
2
A comprehensive multimodal pain treatment reduces opioid consumption after multilevel spine surgery.综合性多模式疼痛治疗可减少多节段脊柱手术后阿片类药物的消耗。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Sep;22(9):2089-96. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2826-1. Epub 2013 May 17.
3
The SF-36: a simple, effective measure of mobility-disability for epidemiological studies.SF-36：一种用于流行病学研究的简单、有效的活动能力残疾测量方法。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2009 Jan;13(1):57-62. doi: 10.1007/s12603-009-0010-4.
4
Sample sizes for cancer trials where Health Related Quality of Life is the primary outcome.以健康相关生活质量为主要结局的癌症试验的样本量。
Br J Cancer. 2000 Oct;83(7):959-63. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1383.
5
Sample size calculations in studies using the EuroQol 5D.使用欧洲五维度健康量表（EuroQol 5D）的研究中的样本量计算。
Qual Life Res. 1999 Sep;8(6):539-49. doi: 10.1023/a:1008973731515.
6
Health economics and quality of life in cancer trials: report based on a UKCCCR workshop. United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research.癌症试验中的健康经济学与生活质量：基于英国癌症研究协调委员会研讨会的报告。英国癌症研究协调委员会
Br J Cancer. 1998 May;77(10):1543-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.254.
7
Sample sizes for randomized trials measuring quality of life in cancer patients.衡量癌症患者生活质量的随机试验的样本量。
Qual Life Res. 1997 Mar;6(2):109-17. doi: 10.1023/a:1026481815304.
8
The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷QLQ-C30评分的解读
Qual Life Res. 1996 Dec;5(6):555-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00439229.
9
Estimating sample sizes for studies using the SF-36 health survey.使用SF-36健康调查进行研究时的样本量估计。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Aug;50(4):473-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.4.473.
本文引用的文献
1
Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age.简短型36项健康调查问卷（SF36）：工作年龄成年人的常模数据。
BMJ. 1993 May 29;306(6890):1437-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1437.
2
Sample size calculations for ordered categorical data.有序分类数据的样本量计算。
Stat Med. 1993 Dec 30;12(24):2257-71. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780122404.
3
The short form 36 health status questionnaire: clues from the Oxford region's normative data about its usefulness in measuring health gain in population surveys.36项简易健康状况调查问卷：来自牛津地区标准数据的线索，关于其在人口调查中衡量健康收益的有用性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Feb;49(1):102-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.1.102.
4
Indexes and boundaries for "quantitative significance" in statistical decisions.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(12):1273-84. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90093-5.
5
Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.验证SF-36健康调查问卷：初级保健的新结局指标。
BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):160-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160.
Zotero 插件