• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙科复合材料四种断裂韧性测试模式的比较。

Comparison of four modes of fracture toughness testing for dental composites.

作者信息

Fujishima A, Ferracane J L

机构信息

Department of Oral Biomaterials and Technology, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 1996 Jan;12(1):38-43. doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80062-5.

DOI:10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80062-5
PMID:8598249
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Investigators have reported on the measurement of fracture toughness (K(lc)) of dental composites using a variety of testing methods. However, fracture toughness has been shown to be dependent upon several variables, including crack-tip sharpness and specimen geometry. This study was designed to compare the fracture toughness values obtained for two experimental and three commercial posterior composites, using four popular testing methods.

METHODS

The four methods for testing fracture toughness included single-edge notched, compact tension, short rod with chevron notch and double torsion. The results were compared by ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test (p < or = 0.05).

RESULTS

The values obtained from the short rod test were significantly higher than those from the three other tests. Evaluation of the load-deflection curves and fracture surfaces suggested that the data for this test may not have been valid because a stable crack growth region could not be identified. In general, the fracture toughness results obtained from the double torsion test were lower than values obtained from the single-edge notched and compact tension methods. The double torsion test was the most difficult to conduct, resulting in only a 50% success rate.

SIGNIFICANCE

The double torsion test, though possibly the most technique-sensitive of the four fracture toughness methods evaluated provides the most information about crack initiation and propagation and may be most indicative of the true fracture toughness of dental composites.

摘要

目的

研究人员已报道了使用多种测试方法测量牙科复合材料的断裂韧性(K(lc))。然而,已表明断裂韧性取决于几个变量,包括裂纹尖端的尖锐度和试样几何形状。本研究旨在使用四种常用测试方法比较两种实验性和三种市售后牙复合材料获得的断裂韧性值。

方法

测试断裂韧性的四种方法包括单边切口、紧凑拉伸、带人字形切口的短棒和双扭转。通过方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验(p≤0.05)对结果进行比较。

结果

短棒测试获得的值明显高于其他三种测试的值。对载荷-挠度曲线和断裂表面的评估表明,该测试的数据可能无效,因为无法确定稳定的裂纹扩展区域。一般来说,双扭转测试获得的断裂韧性结果低于单边切口和紧凑拉伸方法获得的值。双扭转测试最难进行,成功率仅为50%。

意义

双扭转测试虽然可能是所评估的四种断裂韧性方法中对技术最敏感的,但它提供了关于裂纹萌生和扩展的最多信息,可能最能表明牙科复合材料的真实断裂韧性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of four modes of fracture toughness testing for dental composites.牙科复合材料四种断裂韧性测试模式的比较。
Dent Mater. 1996 Jan;12(1):38-43. doi: 10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80062-5.
2
Fracture toughness of posterior resin composites.后牙树脂复合材料的断裂韧性
Quintessence Int. 2001 Mar;32(3):206-10.
3
Fracture toughness of nine flowable resin composites.九种可流动树脂复合材料的断裂韧性
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Mar;89(3):261-7. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.33.
4
Calculation of contraction stresses in dental composites by analysis of crack propagation in the matrix surrounding a cavity.通过分析围绕龋洞的基质中的裂纹扩展来计算牙科复合材料中的收缩应力。
Dent Mater. 2009 Apr;25(4):543-50. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.10.008. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
5
R-curve behavior and micromechanisms of fracture in resin based dental restorative composites.基于树脂的牙科修复复合材料的R曲线行为及断裂微观机制
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009 Oct;2(5):502-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.12.005. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
6
Fracture toughness comparison of six resin composites.六种树脂复合材料的断裂韧性比较
Dent Mater. 2008 Mar;24(3):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.018. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
7
R-curve behavior and toughening mechanisms of resin-based dental composites: effects of hydration and post-cure heat treatment.树脂基牙科复合材料的R曲线行为及增韧机制:水化和后固化热处理的影响
Dent Mater. 2009 Jun;25(6):760-70. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.12.004. Epub 2009 Feb 1.
8
Fracture toughness comparison of three test methods with four dental porcelains.
Dent Mater. 2007 Jul;23(7):905-10. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.033. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
9
The effect of thermocycling on the fracture toughness and hardness of core buildup materials.热循环对核桩修复材料断裂韧性和硬度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Nov;86(5):474-80. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.120110.
10
Measuring the residual stress in dental composites using a ring slitting method.
Dent Mater. 2005 Sep;21(9):882-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Fracture Toughness of Short Fibre-Reinforced Composites-In Vitro Study.短纤维增强复合材料的断裂韧性——体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2024 Nov 2;17(21):5368. doi: 10.3390/ma17215368.
2
Miscibility and Optimization of the Liquid Rubber Content in the Resins of Light-Cured Dental Composites.光固化牙科复合材料树脂中液体橡胶含量的混溶性及优化
Materials (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;16(1):87. doi: 10.3390/ma16010087.
3
"Fatigue-Crack Propagation Behavior in Microcapsule-Containing Self-Healing Polymeric Networks".含微胶囊的自修复聚合物网络中的疲劳裂纹扩展行为
Mater Des. 2022 Nov;223. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111142. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
4
Reinforcing the cervical dentin with bonded materials to improve fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots.用粘结材料增强颈段牙本质以提高根管治疗后牙根的抗折性。
J Conserv Dent. 2022 Mar-Apr;25(2):179-184. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_609_21. Epub 2022 May 4.
5
Physical and Mechanical Properties of Bulk-Fill, Conventional, and Flowable Resin Composites Stored Dry and Wet.干燥和潮湿条件下储存的大块充填、传统型和可流动树脂复合材料的物理和机械性能
Int J Dent. 2022 Feb 10;2022:7946239. doi: 10.1155/2022/7946239. eCollection 2022.
6
Fracture toughness of dental restorative materials.牙科修复材料的断裂韧性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Apr;16(2):489-98. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0525-z. Epub 2011 Mar 2.