Suppr超能文献

六种树脂复合材料的断裂韧性比较

Fracture toughness comparison of six resin composites.

作者信息

Watanabe Hidehiko, Khera Satish C, Vargas Marcos A, Qian Fang

机构信息

Department of Adult Restorative Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Dentistry, 40th and Holdrege Streets, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583, USA.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 2008 Mar;24(3):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.018. Epub 2007 Aug 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the Mode I and II fracture toughness values of resin composites used for the restorations of anterior teeth by the Brazilian disk test method.

METHODS

The Brazilian disk test was performed on six commercially available dental resin composites, Venus (hybrid resin composite), Durafill (micro-filled resin composite), Gradia (micro-filled/hybrid resin composite), Point4 (hybrid resin composite), Supreme (nano-particle resin composite) and Filtek Z250 (resin composite with zirconia particles). Five resin composite disks of 25 mm in diameter and 2mm in thickness with chevron notches were prepared for each fracture mode per material. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24h at 37 degrees C, and then tested by a Zwick testing machine under compression mode with a constant crosshead speed of 0.25 mm/min at room temperature. The stress intensity factors under combined Modes I and II fracture toughness were calculated by the formula presented by Atkinson et al. The fracture patterns of two specimens randomly selected from each test group were examined using a scanning electron microscope. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for the statistical evaluations followed by the post-hoc Tukey's Student Range (HSD) test.

RESULTS

The highest mean Mode I and II fracture toughness values were found in Filtek Z250 and Filtek Supreme and they were significantly higher than other materials (comparisons significant at the 0.05 level). The intermediate group consisted of Point4, Venus and Gradia ANTERIOR, whereas Durafill, statistically, had the lowest mean value for fracture toughness.

SIGNIFICANCE

Fracture toughness values of hybrid and nano-particle resin composites are significantly higher than those of micro-filled resin composites. This suggests that the latter should be used for non-stress bearing areas.

摘要

目的

本研究采用巴西圆盘试验方法,调查用于前牙修复的树脂复合材料的I型和II型断裂韧性值。

方法

对六种市售牙科树脂复合材料进行巴西圆盘试验,分别为Venus(混合树脂复合材料)、Durafill(微填料树脂复合材料)、Gradia(微填料/混合树脂复合材料)、Point4(混合树脂复合材料)、Supreme(纳米颗粒树脂复合材料)和Filtek Z250(含氧化锆颗粒的树脂复合材料)。每种材料针对每种断裂模式制备五个直径25mm、厚度2mm且带有人字形切口的树脂复合圆盘。将试样在37℃的蒸馏水中储存24小时,然后在室温下使用Zwick试验机以0.25mm/min的恒定十字头速度在压缩模式下进行测试。根据Atkinson等人提出的公式计算I型和II型组合断裂韧性下的应力强度因子。使用扫描电子显微镜检查从每个测试组中随机选择的两个试样的断裂模式。进行单因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计评估,随后进行事后Tukey学生极差(HSD)检验。

结果

Filtek Z250和Filtek Supreme的I型和II型平均断裂韧性值最高,且显著高于其他材料(在0.05水平上比较具有显著性)。中间组包括Point4、Venus和Gradia ANTERIOR,而Durafill在统计学上的断裂韧性平均值最低。

意义

混合和纳米颗粒树脂复合材料的断裂韧性值显著高于微填料树脂复合材料。这表明后者应用于非受力区域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验