Sundblad A S, Pellicer E M, Ricci L
Hospital Privado de Comunidad y Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina.
Hum Pathol. 1996 Mar;27(3):297-301. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(96)90072-6.
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has been detected by immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma, but its relationship with prognosis is still unclear. This difficulty may be because of the great variety of antibodies used for its determination. In the present study, 271 stages I and II breast carcinomas are analyzed by immunohistochemistry, using T84.66 antibody, a well-known highly specific CEA antibody. The results show that CEA expression was not associated with any of the clinicopathologic factors analyzed. Factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) after univariate logistic regression analyses were tumor size smaller than 2 cm (P = .01), lymph node free of metastases (P = .0000), low nuclear grade (P = .007), absence of c-erbB-2 overexpression (P = .02), and bcl-2 (P = .005) and CEA expression (P = .005), whereas those significantly associated with a better overall survival (OS) were tumor size small than 2 cm (P = .002), lymph node free of metastases (P = .0001), low nuclear grade (P = .01), low histological grade (P = .02), absence of c-erbB-2 overexpression (P = .002) and bcl-2 expression (P = .01). After multivariate stepwise regression analysis, lymph node free of metastases (P = .0000), CEA expression (P = .001), absence of c-erbB-2 overexpression (P = .01), and bcl-2 expression (P = .01) were found to be independent factors associated with DFS, whereas lymph node free of metastases (P = .0000), tumor size smaller than 2 cm (P = .0000), and absence of c-erbB-2 overexpression (P = .004) were associated with a better OS. These results show that immunohistochemical detection of CEA with the antibody T84.66 may be useful as an additional factor in establishing breast cancer prognosis.
免疫组化已在乳腺癌中检测到癌胚抗原(CEA),但其与预后的关系仍不明确。这一困难可能是由于用于检测的抗体种类繁多。在本研究中,使用著名的高特异性CEA抗体T84.66,通过免疫组化分析了271例I期和II期乳腺癌。结果显示,CEA表达与所分析的任何临床病理因素均无关联。单因素逻辑回归分析后,与无病生存期(DFS)相关的因素包括肿瘤大小小于2 cm(P = .01)、无淋巴结转移(P = .0000)、核分级低(P = .007)、无c-erbB-2过表达(P = .02)、bcl-2(P = .005)和CEA表达(P = .005),而与总生存期(OS)显著相关的因素包括肿瘤大小小于2 cm(P = .002)、无淋巴结转移(P = .0001)、核分级低(P = .01)、组织学分级低(P = .02)、无c-erbB-2过表达(P = .002)和bcl-2表达(P = .01)。多因素逐步回归分析后,发现无淋巴结转移(P = .0000)、CEA表达(P = .001)、无c-erbB-2过表达(P = .01)和bcl-2表达(P = .01)是与DFS相关的独立因素,而无淋巴结转移(P = .0000)、肿瘤大小小于2 cm(P = .0000)和无c-erbB-2过表达(P = .004)与更好的OS相关。这些结果表明,用抗体T84.66进行CEA的免疫组化检测可能作为确定乳腺癌预后的一个附加因素有用。