Burris S
Temple University of School of Law, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Arch Fam Med. 1996 Feb;5(2):102-6. doi: 10.1001/archfami.5.2.102.
During the first years of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic, the professional limitation on HIV-infected physicians and other health care workers were left to the discretion of the infected workers themselves and the medical institutions in which they worked. In the crisis occasioned by the report of iatrogenic infection in a Florida dental practice, the legal system was expected to develop mandatory standards for the management of an estimated 50 000 American health care workers with HIV. Evaluation of the legal developments of the past 3 years, including state practice guidelines, tort law, and disability discrimination law, suggests that judges and regulators have been unwilling or unable to set a binding standard. This offers the medical profession a second chance to formulate and educate the public about a socially responsible, nonrestrictive policy.
在人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)流行的最初几年,对感染HIV的医生和其他医护人员的职业限制由受感染的工作人员本人及其工作的医疗机构自行决定。在佛罗里达州一家牙科诊所发生医源性感染报告引发的危机中,法律系统有望为估计5万名感染HIV的美国医护人员制定管理的强制性标准。对过去3年法律发展情况的评估,包括州实践指南、侵权法和残疾歧视法,表明法官和监管机构一直不愿意或无法设定具有约束力的标准。这为医学界提供了第二次机会,来制定并向公众宣传一项对社会负责、无限制的政策。