Suppr超能文献

医院吸烟禁令与员工吸烟行为:一项全国性调查结果

Hospital smoking bans and employee smoking behavior: Results of a national survey.

作者信息

Longo D R, Brownson R C, Johnson J C, Hewett J E, Kruse R L, Novotny T E, Logan R A

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65212, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1996 Apr 24;275(16):1252-7.

PMID:8601957
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of workplace smoking bans on smoking behavior of employees.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1469 current or former smokers (intervention group) employed in smoke-free hospitals and 920 current or former smokers (comparison group) employed in non-smoke-free workplaces were surveyed to determine smoking behavior.

DESIGN

This cross-sectional study is part of a larger, ongoing prospective study. The study design was quasi-experimental. We randomly selected sites consisting of a hospital and a corresponding community. Furthermore, we randomly selected subjects from hospitals and their corresponding communities.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postban quit ratio and progression along the stages-of-change continuum.

METHODS

The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare the postban quit ratio between the intervention and comparison groups. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel analysis of variance statistic was used to compare groups on the stages-of-change variables.

RESULTS

Beginning with the smoking ban and continuing for 5 years after implementation, statistically significant differences in the postban quit ratio were observed between employees of smoke-free hospitals who were smokers and counterparts in the community (P<.001). Despite preban differences in smoking intensity, the overall difference in postban quit ratios remained significant even after multivariate adjustment for socioeconomic, demographic, and smoking intensity variables. For those sites that were 5 years postban, the quit ratio was 0.506 in smoke-free workplaces compared with 0.377 in workplaces where smoking was permitted. In all but 1 category, the intervention group was further along the stages-of-change continuum toward quitting smoking than the comparison group (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

American hospitals' experiences with smoking bans, which directly affect more than 5 million workers, should be examined by other industries as a method of improving employee health. Workplace smoking bans could also be effective in saving lives, reducing health care costs, addressing safety concerns, and decreasing operating and maintenance expenses of employers.

摘要

目的

探讨工作场所禁烟对员工吸烟行为的影响。

参与者

对1469名在无烟医院工作的现吸烟者或 former smokers(干预组)和920名在非无烟工作场所工作的现吸烟者或former smokers(对照组)进行调查,以确定吸烟行为。

设计

本横断面研究是一项更大的正在进行的前瞻性研究的一部分。研究设计为准实验性。我们随机选择了由一家医院和一个相应社区组成的地点。此外,我们从医院及其相应社区中随机选择受试者。

主要观察指标

禁烟后戒烟率及沿改变阶段连续体的进展情况。

方法

采用Cox比例风险模型比较干预组和对照组的禁烟后戒烟率。采用Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel方差分析统计量比较两组在改变阶段变量上的差异。

结果

从实施禁烟开始并持续5年后,观察到无烟医院吸烟员工与社区对应人员在禁烟后戒烟率上存在统计学显著差异(P<0.001)。尽管禁烟前吸烟强度存在差异,但在对社会经济、人口统计学和吸烟强度变量进行多变量调整后,禁烟后戒烟率的总体差异仍然显著。对于那些禁烟后5年的地点,无烟工作场所的戒烟率为0.506,而允许吸烟的工作场所为0.377。除1个类别外,干预组在戒烟改变阶段连续体上比对照组更接近戒烟(P<0.001)。

结论

美国医院的禁烟经验直接影响到500多万工人,其他行业应将其作为改善员工健康的一种方法进行研究。工作场所禁烟在挽救生命、降低医疗成本、解决安全问题以及降低雇主的运营和维护费用方面也可能是有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验