Longo D R, Johnson J C, Kruse R L, Brownson R C, Hewett J E
Center for Family Medicine Science in the Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65212, USA.
Tob Control. 2001 Sep;10(3):267-72. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.3.267.
To examine the long term impact of workplace smoking bans on employee smoking cessation and relapse. Over three years we studied a total of 1033 current or former smokers (intervention group) employed in smoke-free hospitals and 816 current or former smokers (comparison group) employed in non-smoke-free workplaces. The design of this natural experiment is a prospective cohort study. We randomly selected both hospitals and employees from 12 strata based on hospital size and state tobacco regulations, and sampled employees in the same communities. Main outcome measures were post-ban quit ratio and relapse rate.
Between groups comparisons were conducted using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistic for general association, stratified Cox proportional hazards models, and the CMH analysis of variance statistic based on ranks. McNemar's test and the sign test were used to test for changes over time within each group.
Differences in the post-ban quit ratio were observed between intervention and comparison groups (p < or = 0.02). For employees whose bans were implemented at least seven years before survey, the post-ban quit ratio was estimated at 0.256, compared with 0.142 for employees in non-smoke-free workplaces (p = 0.02). After controlling for a variety of factors, time to quit smoking was shorter for the hospital employees (p < 0.001), with an overall relative risk of quitting of 2.3. Contrary to expectations, relapse rates were similar between the groups.
Employees in workplaces with smoking bans have higher rates of smoking cessation than employees where smoking is permitted, but relapse is similar between these two groups of employees. The results of this investigation have international applicability for policy makers, clinicians, employers, and employees. Countries should review smoking policies in workplaces in light of their own smoking patterns and efforts to deal with environmental tobacco smoke.
探讨工作场所禁烟对员工戒烟及复吸的长期影响。在三年多的时间里,我们共研究了1033名在无烟医院工作的现吸烟者或曾经吸烟者(干预组)以及816名在非无烟工作场所工作的现吸烟者或曾经吸烟者(对照组)。这项自然实验的设计为前瞻性队列研究。我们根据医院规模和州烟草法规从12个层次中随机选取医院和员工,并在相同社区对员工进行抽样。主要结局指标为禁烟后的戒烟率和复吸率。
采用 Cochr an - Mantel - Haenszel一般关联性统计量、分层Cox比例风险模型以及基于秩次的CMH方差分析统计量进行组间比较。使用McNemar检验和符号检验来检验每组随时间的变化情况。
干预组和对照组在禁烟后的戒烟率存在差异(p≤0.02)。对于那些在调查前至少七年实施禁烟的员工,禁烟后的戒烟率估计为0.256,相比之下,在非无烟工作场所工作的员工戒烟率为0.142(p = 0.02)。在控制了各种因素后,医院员工戒烟的时间更短(p < 0.001),总体戒烟相对风险为2.3。与预期相反,两组的复吸率相似。
工作场所实施禁烟的员工戒烟率高于允许吸烟场所的员工,但这两组员工的复吸情况相似。本调查结果对政策制定者、临床医生、雇主和员工具有国际适用性。各国应根据自身的吸烟模式和应对环境烟草烟雾的努力来审视工作场所的吸烟政策。