Elms T N, Buschang P H, Alexander R G
Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, TX 75246, USA.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Mar;109(3):271-6. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70150-6.
The long-term stability of Class II, Division 1 nonextraction therapy remains poorly described. This study evaluates the face-bow therapy, in conjunction with full-fixed appliance therapy, of 42 patients (34 females and 8 males) who were treated by the same practitioner. Treatment goals had been attained for all patients. The pretreatment, posttreatment, and postretention records were taken at 11.5, 14.5, and 23.1 years, respectively. The results showed that mandibular and maxillary arch widths were increased significantly during treatment. Mandibular intercanine width decreased 0.3 mm during the postretention period; the remaining width measures increased or remained stable. Arch length, which did not change during treatment, decreased 1.0 mm after treatment. Overjet and overbite decreased 4.4 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively, during treatment. Both overjet (0.5 mm) and overbite (0.4 mm) showed small increases after retention. Mandibular incisor irregularity was decreased 2.7 mm during treatment and increased only 0.4 mm after treatment. Within the limits of this study, it is concluded that, when the described techniques are used, nonextraction therapy for patients with Class II malocclusion is largely stable.
II类1分类不拔牙矫治的长期稳定性仍缺乏充分描述。本研究评估了同一医生治疗的42例患者(34名女性和8名男性)采用面弓治疗联合全固定矫治器治疗的效果。所有患者均达到了治疗目标。治疗前、治疗后和保持后的记录分别在11.5年、14.5年和23.1年时获取。结果显示,治疗期间下颌和上颌牙弓宽度显著增加。保持期下颌尖牙间宽度减少了0.3mm;其余宽度测量值增加或保持稳定。牙弓长度在治疗期间未发生变化,治疗后减少了1.0mm。治疗期间覆盖和覆合分别减少了4.4mm和2.5mm。保持后覆盖(0.5mm)和覆合(0.4mm)均有小幅增加。治疗期间下颌切牙不齐减少了2.7mm,治疗后仅增加了0.4mm。在本研究范围内,得出的结论是,当采用所述技术时,II类错牙合患者的不拔牙矫治在很大程度上是稳定的。