Suppr超能文献

安氏II类1分类不拔牙矫治中颏面弓疗法的长期稳定性:II. 头影测量分析

Long-term stability of Class II, Division 1, nonextraction cervical face-bow therapy: II. Cephalometric analysis.

作者信息

Elms T N, Buschang P H, Alexander R G

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Apr;109(4):386-92. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70120-8.

Abstract

The long-term stability of Class II, Division 1 nonextraction therapy, using cervical face-bows with full fixed orthodontic appliances was evaluated for 42 randomly selected patients. Part 1, a study model analysis, was published in the March 1996 issue of the JOURNAL. Each patient was treated by the same practitioner, with the same techniques, and the treatment goals had been attained for all patients. Pretreatment records were taken at a mean age of 11.5 years; the posttreatment and postretention records were taken 3.0 and 11.6 years later, respectively. The results showed that the ANB angle decreased 2 degrees during treatment, most of which was due to the 1.6 degree decrease of the SNA angle. The mandibular plane angle was not changed significantly during treatment. Although upper incisor inclination was maintained during treatment, the lower incisor was proclined 2.3 degrees and the lower molar was tipped back 4 degrees. Of the 22 cephalometric measures evaluated, only four indicated relapse related with the treatment change. Three of the four measures pertain to lower incisor retroclination subsequent to excessive proclination. The ratio of treatment proclination of incisors to posttreatment retroclination is approximately 5:1. Similarly, for every 3 degrees of molar tip back, there was approximately 1 degree of relapse. It is concluded that nonextraction therapy for Class II malocclusion can be largely stable when the orthodontist ensures proper patient selection and compliance and attains treatment objectives.

摘要

对42例随机选取的患者采用颈面弓与全固定正畸矫治器进行Ⅱ类1分类不拔牙矫治的长期稳定性进行了评估。第一部分,一项研究模型分析,发表于1996年3月的《杂志》。每位患者均由同一位医生采用相同技术进行治疗,且所有患者均已达到治疗目标。治疗前记录于平均年龄11.5岁时获取;治疗后和保持后记录分别于3.0年和11.6年后获取。结果显示,治疗期间ANB角减小2°,其中大部分是由于SNA角减小1.6°所致。治疗期间下颌平面角无显著变化。尽管治疗期间上切牙倾斜度得以维持,但下切牙前倾2.3°,下磨牙后倾4°。在评估的22项头影测量指标中,只有4项显示与治疗变化相关的复发。这4项指标中的3项与切牙过度前倾后的后倾有关。切牙治疗前倾与治疗后后倾的比例约为5:1。同样,每3°的磨牙后倾,大约有1°的复发。结论是,当正畸医生确保正确的患者选择和依从性并实现治疗目标时,Ⅱ类错牙合不拔牙矫治在很大程度上可以保持稳定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验