Lewis C E, Grandits A, Flack J, McDonald R, Elmer P J
Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Feb 26;156(4):377-85.
To explore the sex-specific benefits and risks of treatment of stage 1 diastolic hypertension.
Participants were African-American and white hypertensive men (n = 557) and women (n = 345) (age range, 45 to 69 years) with a diastolic blood pressure less than 100 mm Hg. Participants were randomized to treatment with placebo, chlorthalidone (15 mg/d), acebutolol hydrochloride (400 mg/d), doxazosin mesylate (2 mg/d), amlodipine besylate (5 mg/d), or enalapril maleate (5 mg/d); all were given nutritional-hygienic intervention.
After 4 years, women who were randomized to lifestyle intervention only were less likely to be receiving step 1 therapy alone (placebo) than men who were randomized to placebo therapy (46% vs 66%, respectively, P < .01). There were significantly greater decreases in the mean systolic blood pressure in both men and women who were assigned to treatment with active drugs compared with those participants who were receiving placebo therapy; differences among treatments with active drugs were similar between men and women. Men experienced larger falls in their total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels regardless of the treatment assignment than did women; however, there were no significant sex-by-treatment interactions. Quality-of-life indexes were generally improved with active drug treatment compared with placebo therapy in both sexes; there was a sex-by-treatment interaction for the general health index. The relative risk (RR) for combined clinical events was similar in women (RR, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], (0.36 to 1.16) and in men (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.14) who were assigned to treatment with all active drugs combined, compared with those who were receiving placebo therapy.
In these exploratory analyses, men and women who were assigned to treatment with active drugs experienced greater and generally similar benefits from treatment than those participants who were assigned to lifestyle intervention only.
探讨1期舒张期高血压治疗的性别特异性益处和风险。
参与者为非裔美国人和白人高血压男性(n = 557)和女性(n = 345)(年龄范围45至69岁),舒张压低于100 mmHg。参与者被随机分配接受安慰剂、氯噻酮(15 mg/d)、盐酸醋丁洛尔(400 mg/d)、甲磺酸多沙唑嗪(2 mg/d)、苯磺酸氨氯地平(5 mg/d)或马来酸依那普利(5 mg/d)治疗;所有参与者均接受营养卫生干预。
4年后,仅接受生活方式干预的女性比接受安慰剂治疗的男性单独接受1级治疗(安慰剂)的可能性更小(分别为46%和66%,P <.01)。与接受安慰剂治疗的参与者相比,接受活性药物治疗的男性和女性的平均收缩压均有显著更大幅度的下降;活性药物治疗之间的差异在男性和女性中相似。无论治疗分配如何,男性的总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和甘油三酯水平下降幅度均大于女性;然而,不存在治疗与性别的显著交互作用。与安慰剂治疗相比,活性药物治疗总体上改善了两性的生活质量指数;一般健康指数存在治疗与性别的交互作用。与接受安慰剂治疗的参与者相比,接受所有活性药物联合治疗的女性(相对风险[RR],0.64;95%置信区间[CI],0.36至1.16)和男性(RR,0.67;95%CI,0.40至1.14)发生联合临床事件的相对风险相似。
在这些探索性分析中,接受活性药物治疗的男性和女性比仅接受生活方式干预的参与者从治疗中获得的益处更大且总体相似。