McKetney E C, Ragland D R
Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Apr 15;143(8):787-91. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008816.
John Henryism refers to an individual's self-perceived ability to meet the demands of the environment through hard work and determination. Prior research has shown that those with above average John Henryism but below average education (education being a measure of coping resources) had higher blood pressure levels than those with other combinations of John Henryism and education. The joint influence of John Henryism and education on blood pressure was examined among 4,986 black and white men and women, 18-30 years of age, from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. The combination of high John Henryism and low education was not associated with elevated systolic or diastolic blood pressure in any of the four groups defined by race and sex. However, the youthfulness of the population and the absence of a previously noted inverse association between education and blood pressure in this population draw into question the appropriateness of this setting to interpret the effect of John Henryism on the blood pressure-education relation.
“约翰·亨利主义”指的是个人通过努力工作和决心来满足环境需求的自我认知能力。先前的研究表明,那些具有高于平均水平的“约翰·亨利主义”但教育水平低于平均水平(教育是应对资源的一种衡量标准)的人,其血压水平高于那些具有“约翰·亨利主义”和教育水平其他组合的人。在一项针对4986名年龄在18至30岁之间的黑人和白人男性及女性的“青年动脉粥样硬化风险发展研究”(CARDIA研究)中,研究了“约翰·亨利主义”和教育对血压的联合影响。在由种族和性别定义的四组人群中,高“约翰·亨利主义”和低教育水平的组合与收缩压或舒张压升高均无关联。然而,该人群的年轻以及此前未发现该人群中教育与血压之间存在反向关联这一情况,让人质疑在此背景下解释“约翰·亨利主义”对血压 - 教育关系影响的恰当性。