Suppr超能文献

双侧肝内胆管狭窄复杂肝内胆管结石系统管理的再评估

Reappraisal of the systematic management of complicated hepatolithiasis with bilateral intrahepatic biliary strictures.

作者信息

Jeng K S, Ohta I, Yang F S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1996 Feb;131(2):141-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430140031008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results, limitations, and complications of the surgical treatment of bilateral hepatolithiasis and intrahepatic biliary strictures with left hepatectomy and without left hepatectomy.

DESIGN

Case-controlled study.

SETTING

Referral center.

PATIENTS

During a 12-year period, 103 patients with bilateral hepatolithiasis and intrahepatic biliary strictures underwent surgical treatment. Group A (n = 73) received left hepatic resection (lateral segmentectomy or lobectomy) and postoperative biliary dilatation with residual stone extraction. Group B (n = 30) underwent the same procedures except for left hepatectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Left lateral segmentectomy or left lobectomy, choledocholithotomy, postoperative cholangioscopic treatments (electrohydraulic lithotripsy, other lithotripsy, lithotomy, balloon dilatation, etc. via T tube or precutaneous transhepatic route).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Days of hospitalization, incidence of major and minor complications, mortality rates, and the rates of residual stones and stone recurrence were compared.

RESULTS

Group A and B had similarly low postoperative 1-month mortality rates of 5.5% and 6.7%, respectively. The main cause of death in both groups was uncontrollable septicemia. The main major complications in group A were intra-abdominal abscess and upper gastrointestinal bleeding; the major complication in group B was massive hemobilia. Group B had a significantly higher overall rate of complications (53.3% vs 23.3%, P < .01) and a longer hospital stay than group A (median, 72 days vs 28 days, P < .03). When complications were classified as major or minor, only minor complications showed a significant difference (30% vs 13.7%, P = .05). After using biliary stricture dilatation and stone extraction, the rate of residual stones in the right lobe was similar in both groups, but patients in group B had a significantly higher rate of residual stones (12.5% vs 0%, P < .02) and stone recurrence in the left lobe (19% vs 0%, P < .003) than those in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

Partial resection of the left lobe in cases of bilateral hepatolithiasis and biliary strictures can effectively simplify problems in the treatment of bilateral hepatolithiasis and intrahepatic biliary strictures. In addition, not only were surgical complications not increased, but a decrease in complications from postoperative manipulations for stone clearance was noted in our series.

摘要

目的

比较行左肝切除与未行左肝切除治疗双侧肝内胆管结石及肝内胆管狭窄的手术效果、局限性及并发症。

设计

病例对照研究。

地点

转诊中心。

患者

在12年期间,103例双侧肝内胆管结石及肝内胆管狭窄患者接受了手术治疗。A组(n = 73)接受左肝切除(外侧段切除术或肝叶切除术)及术后胆管扩张并取残留结石。B组(n = 30)除未行左肝切除外,接受相同手术操作。

干预措施

左外侧段切除术或左肝叶切除术、胆总管切开取石术、术后胆道镜治疗(通过T管或经皮经肝途径进行电液压碎石、其他碎石、取石、球囊扩张等)。

主要观察指标

比较住院天数、严重及轻微并发症发生率、死亡率、残留结石率及结石复发率。

结果

A组和B组术后1个月死亡率同样较低,分别为5.5%和6.7%。两组死亡的主要原因均为无法控制的败血症。A组主要的严重并发症为腹腔内脓肿和上消化道出血;B组主要的严重并发症为大量胆道出血。B组总体并发症发生率显著高于A组(53.3%对23.3%,P <.01),住院时间也比A组长(中位数,72天对28天,P <.03)。当将并发症分为严重或轻微时,仅轻微并发症有显著差异(30%对13.7%,P =.05)。在采用胆管狭窄扩张及取石后,两组右叶残留结石率相似,但B组患者左叶残留结石率(12.5%对0%,P <.02)及结石复发率(19%对0%,P <.003)显著高于A组。

结论

双侧肝内胆管结石及胆管狭窄病例行左叶部分切除可有效简化双侧肝内胆管结石及肝内胆管狭窄的治疗问题。此外,在我们的系列研究中,不仅手术并发症未增加,而且还注意到结石清除术后操作引起的并发症有所减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验