Suppr超能文献

针对成年胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者的食物频率问卷的比较效度。

Comparative validity of a food frequency questionnaire for adults with IDDM.

作者信息

Riley M D, Blizzard L

机构信息

Menzies Centre for Population Health Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 1995 Sep;18(9):1249-54. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.9.1249.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the characteristics of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in measuring dietary intake in an adult insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) population. FFQs have been widely used in developed countries to assess usual dietary intake; however, information regarding the application of the method to individuals advised to follow a specific dietary regimen (such as people with IDDM) is scarce.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The measurement of energy and macronutrients by an interviewer-administered FFQ was assessed in 84 adults, who were representative of adults with IDDM in Tasmania, Australia, by comparing it with 2 days of weighed dietary records. Mean daily energy and macronutrient intakes by each method were compared, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for both unadjusted and energy-adjusted macronutrient intakes.

RESULTS

The ratio of within-person to between-person variance in dietary estimates from weighed records was 0.53 for energy, 0.70 for fat, 2.55 for protein, 0.50 for carbohydrate, 0.78 for saturated fat, and 3.56 for dietary cholesterol. The correlation coefficient between the FFQ and a 2-day weighed dietary record for the same nutrients ranged from 0.38 for protein intake to 0.60 for saturated fat intake. The correlation coefficient between the FFQ and true usual dietary intake was estimated to be 0.60 for energy-adjusted fat intake, 0.36 for energy-adjusted protein intake, 0.72 for energy-adjusted carbohydrate intake, 0.55 for energy-adjusted saturated fat intake, and 0.77 for energy-adjusted cholesterol intake.

CONCLUSIONS

People with IDDM had a low ratio of within-person to between-person variance in daily energy, fat, carbohydrate, saturate fat, and cholesterol intake. The performance of the FFQ in the IDDM population is consistent with similar questionnaires in nondiabetic populations; however, there was a significant decrease in the dietary energy estimate upon readministration of the questionnaire. Validation studies such as this are important to provide information to guide the design and analysis of investigations that use dietary questionnaires.

摘要

目的

研究食物频率问卷(FFQ)在测量成年胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)人群饮食摄入量方面的特点。FFQ在发达国家已被广泛用于评估日常饮食摄入量;然而,关于该方法应用于建议遵循特定饮食方案的个体(如IDDM患者)的信息却很少。

研究设计与方法

通过与2天的称重饮食记录进行比较,对84名澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州具有IDDM代表性的成年患者,采用访谈式FFQ评估能量和常量营养素的摄入量。比较了每种方法的平均每日能量和常量营养素摄入量,并计算了未调整和能量调整后的常量营养素摄入量的Pearson相关系数。

结果

称重记录的饮食估计中,个体内方差与个体间方差之比,能量为0.53,脂肪为0.70,蛋白质为2.55,碳水化合物为0.50,饱和脂肪为0.78,膳食胆固醇为3.56。FFQ与相同营养素的2天称重饮食记录之间的相关系数,蛋白质摄入量为0.38,饱和脂肪摄入量为0.60。FFQ与真实日常饮食摄入量之间的相关系数,能量调整后的脂肪摄入量估计为0.60,能量调整后的蛋白质摄入量为0.36,能量调整后的碳水化合物摄入量为0.72,能量调整后的饱和脂肪摄入量为0.55,能量调整后的胆固醇摄入量为0.77。

结论

IDDM患者在每日能量、脂肪、碳水化合物、饱和脂肪和胆固醇摄入量方面,个体内方差与个体间方差之比很低。FFQ在IDDM人群中的表现与非糖尿病人群中类似问卷的表现一致;然而,再次使用该问卷时,饮食能量估计值显著下降。此类验证研究对于提供信息以指导使用饮食问卷的调查的设计和分析非常重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验