Lindor K D, Therneau T M, Jorgensen R A, Malinchoc M, Dickson E R
Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Gastroenterology. 1996 May;110(5):1515-8. doi: 10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8613058.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis; however, its effect on patient survival is less certain. To study this issue, the survival of patients receiving long-term UDCA treatment was compared with that of a control group, adjusting for their risk scores based on the Mayo model.
One hundred eighty patients were randomized to receive either 13-15 mg.kg-1.day-1 UDCA (n = 89) of placebo (n = 91). After the study closure, the patients originally receiving placebo were switched to active drug, and prospective follow-up was continued for 3 years. Patients were censored at the time of transplantation, voluntary withdrawal, of crossover of the placebo group (efficacy analysis). The survival of the two groups was adjusted for risk scores at the time of entry to the study. A secondary analysis was an intent-to-treat analysis, whereby patients were followed up regardless of their voluntary withdrawal or crossover.
At the time of analysis, the patients receiving placebo had a significantly increased risk of death and/or requiring transplantation (relative risk, 2.6; P = 0.04) compared with the UDCA-treated patients
UDCA should be considered as a safe, effective, and life-extending treatment for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)已被证明是原发性胆汁性肝硬化患者的一种安全有效的治疗方法;然而,其对患者生存率的影响尚不确定。为研究此问题,将接受长期UDCA治疗的患者生存率与对照组进行比较,并根据梅奥模型对其风险评分进行调整。
180例患者被随机分为两组,分别接受13 - 15mg·kg-1·天-1的UDCA(n = 89)或安慰剂(n = 91)。研究结束后,原接受安慰剂治疗的患者改用活性药物,并进行为期3年的前瞻性随访。在移植、自愿退出或安慰剂组交叉时(疗效分析)对患者进行截尾。对两组患者在进入研究时的风险评分进行生存调整。二次分析为意向性分析,即无论患者自愿退出或交叉情况如何,均对其进行随访。
在分析时,与接受UDCA治疗的患者相比,接受安慰剂治疗的患者死亡和/或需要移植的风险显著增加(相对风险,2.6;P = 0.04)。
对于原发性胆汁性肝硬化患者,应将UDCA视为一种安全、有效且能延长生命的治疗方法。