• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的高血压控制教育课程。一项为期1.5年的随机对照试验。

Community-based education classes for hypertension control. A 1.5-year randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Iso H, Shimamoto T, Yokota K, Sankai T, Jacobs D R, Komachi Y

机构信息

Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

出版信息

Hypertension. 1996 Apr;27(4):968-74. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.27.4.968.

DOI:10.1161/01.hyp.27.4.968
PMID:8613276
Abstract

Community-based hypertension control is important for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. In this study, untreated men and women aged 35 to 69 years were randomly assigned to an intervention (n=56) or control (n=55) group in a 1.5-year community-based education program. Subjects had no evidence of hypertensive end-organ defects and had screening blood pressures of 140 to 179 mm Hg systolic and/or 90 to 109 mm Hg diastolic, with no difference in mean blood pressure between groups (148 to 150 mm Hg for mean systolic and 83 to 84 mm Hg for mean diastolic pressures). The intervention group took four education classes in the first 6 months and four classes during the next year, and the control group took two classes. Health education focused on reduced dietary sodium and increased milk intake, brisk walking, and, if necessary, reduction of alcohol and sugar intakes. Antihypertensive medication was started less often in the intervention than in the control group at 1.5 years (9% versus 24%, P <.05). Mean systolic pressure was 5 to 6 mm Hg less in the intervention than in the control group at both 6 months and 1.5 years (P <.05), with or without inclusion of those subjects who began antihypertensive medication. Diastolic pressure and body mass index did not change significantly between groups. Urinary sodium excretion declined in the intervention but not in the control group (differences between groups: P=.04 at 6 months and P=.07 at 1.5 years). According to a behavioral questionnaire, sodium reduction and milk increase were greater in the intervention than the control group (sodium: P <.01 at 6 months and P=.08 at 1.5 years; milk: P <.001 at 6 months and P <.01 at 1.5 years). Mean ethanol intake was reduced in the intervention but not the control group (P=.04 at 1.5 years). This community-based hypertension control program was effective in reducing systolic pressure levels by nonpharmacological means during the first 6 months and maintaining the reduction for 1.5 years.

摘要

基于社区的高血压控制对于心血管疾病的一级预防至关重要。在本研究中,年龄在35至69岁之间未经治疗的男性和女性被随机分配到一个为期1.5年的基于社区的教育项目中的干预组(n = 56)或对照组(n = 55)。受试者没有高血压终末器官损害的证据,筛查血压收缩压为140至179毫米汞柱和/或舒张压为90至109毫米汞柱,两组之间平均血压无差异(平均收缩压为148至150毫米汞柱,平均舒张压为83至84毫米汞柱)。干预组在前6个月参加了4次教育课程,在接下来的一年中参加了4次课程,对照组参加了2次课程。健康教育的重点是减少饮食中的钠摄入、增加牛奶摄入量、快走,必要时减少酒精和糖的摄入量。在1.5年时,干预组开始使用抗高血压药物的频率低于对照组(9%对24%,P<.05)。在6个月和1.5年时,干预组的平均收缩压比对照组低5至6毫米汞柱(P<.05),无论是否纳入开始使用抗高血压药物的受试者。两组之间舒张压和体重指数没有显著变化。干预组的尿钠排泄量下降,而对照组没有(组间差异:6个月时P =.04,1.5年时P =.07)。根据一份行为问卷,干预组的钠减少和牛奶增加情况比对照组更明显(钠:6个月时P<.01,1.5年时P =.08;牛奶:6个月时P<.001,1.5年时P<.01)。干预组的平均乙醇摄入量减少,而对照组没有(1.5年时P =.04)。这个基于社区的高血压控制项目在最初6个月通过非药物手段有效降低了收缩压水平,并在1.5年内维持了这种降低效果。

相似文献

1
Community-based education classes for hypertension control. A 1.5-year randomized controlled trial.基于社区的高血压控制教育课程。一项为期1.5年的随机对照试验。
Hypertension. 1996 Apr;27(4):968-74. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.27.4.968.
2
[A randomized controlled trail of intensive and usual community-based education for blood pressure control].[一项关于强化社区教育与常规社区教育对血压控制效果的随机对照试验]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1994 Oct;41(10):1015-26.
3
Effects of comprehensive lifestyle modification on blood pressure control: main results of the PREMIER clinical trial.综合生活方式改变对血压控制的影响:PREMIER临床试验的主要结果
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2083-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.16.2083.
4
[Effectiveness of a community-based education program on blood pressure reduction for cardiovascular disease prevention].[一项基于社区的血压降低教育项目对预防心血管疾病的效果]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1993 Mar;40(3):147-58.
5
The PREMIER intervention helps participants follow the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension dietary pattern and the current Dietary Reference Intakes recommendations.“总理干预措施”帮助参与者遵循“终止高血压膳食方法”饮食模式以及当前的膳食参考摄入量建议。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Sep;107(9):1541-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.06.019.
6
Effects of weight loss and sodium reduction intervention on blood pressure and hypertension incidence in overweight people with high-normal blood pressure. The Trials of Hypertension Prevention, phase II. The Trials of Hypertension Prevention Collaborative Research Group.体重减轻和钠摄入减少干预对血压正常高值的超重人群血压及高血压发病率的影响。高血压预防试验,第二阶段。高血压预防协作研究组。
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Mar 24;157(6):657-67.
7
The Hypertension Prevention Trial: three-year effects of dietary changes on blood pressure. Hypertension Prevention Trial Research Group.高血压预防试验:饮食改变对血压的三年影响。高血压预防试验研究组
Arch Intern Med. 1990 Jan;150(1):153-62.
8
Lifestyle modifications to prevent and control hypertension. 5. Recommendations on dietary salt. Canadian Hypertension Society, Canadian Coalition for High Blood Pressure Prevention and Control, Laboratory Centre for Disease Control at Health Canada, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.预防和控制高血压的生活方式改变。5. 关于膳食盐的建议。加拿大高血压协会、加拿大高血压预防与控制联盟、加拿大卫生部疾病控制实验室中心、加拿大心脏与中风基金会。
CMAJ. 1999 May 4;160(9 Suppl):S29-34.
9
Effect of a Telephone Health Coaching Intervention on Hypertension Control in Young Adults: The MyHEART Randomized Clinical Trial.电话健康教练干预对年轻人高血压控制的影响:MyHEART 随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2255618. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55618.
10
Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension Study (PATHS): effects of an alcohol treatment program on blood pressure.高血压防治研究(PATHS):酒精治疗项目对血压的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Jun 8;158(11):1197-207. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.11.1197.

引用本文的文献

1
Multipronged biobehavioural intervention strategies for prevention and control of hypertension: A protocol for systematic review of education-based community trials.预防和控制高血压的多方面生物行为干预策略:一项基于教育的社区试验系统评价方案
MethodsX. 2025 Jul 7;15:103494. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2025.103494. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Asia: Opportunities and Solutions: A Narrative Review.亚洲心血管疾病的一级预防:机遇与解决方案:一篇叙述性综述
JACC Adv. 2025 Apr;4(4):101676. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101676. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
3
Group-delivered interventions for lowering blood pressure in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
用于降低高血压患者血压的群体干预措施:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Mar 27;75(753):e266-e276. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0585. Print 2025 Apr.
4
Health-promotion interventions targeting multiple behaviors: A meta-analytic review of general and behavior-specific processes of change.促进健康的干预措施针对多种行为:一般和行为特定变化过程的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul;150(7):798-838. doi: 10.1037/bul0000427. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
5
Risk Classification for Metabolic Syndrome and the Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease in Japan With Low Prevalence of Obesity: A Pooled Analysis of 10 Prospective Cohort Studies.代谢综合征风险分类与日本低肥胖患病率心血管疾病的发生率:10 项前瞻性队列研究的汇总分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 7;10(23):e020760. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.020760. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
6
Effects of Self-Care for Older PErsons (SCOPE) on Functional and Physiological Measures: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.老年人自我护理(SCOPE)对功能和生理指标的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 24;9(3):885. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030885.
7
Health Behaviors, Nocturnal Hypertension, and Non-dipping Blood Pressure: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults and Jackson Heart Study.健康行为、夜间高血压和非杓型血压:年轻人冠状动脉风险发展研究和杰克逊心脏研究。
Am J Hypertens. 2019 Jul 17;32(8):759-768. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpz017.
8
The Circulatory Risk in Communities Study (CIRCS): A Long-Term Epidemiological Study for Lifestyle-Related Disease Among Japanese Men and Women Living in Communities.社区人群心血管危险研究(Circulatory Risk in Communities Study,CIRCS):一项针对居住在社区中的日本男性和女性与生活方式相关疾病的长期流行病学研究。
J Epidemiol. 2019 Mar 5;29(3):83-91. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20180196. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
9
Educational attainment does not modify the effect of educational interventions on blood pressure control: a secondary analysis of data from a randomised trial.教育程度不会改变教育干预对血压控制的效果:一项随机试验数据的二次分析
JRSM Open. 2016 Aug 1;7(8):2054270416654359. doi: 10.1177/2054270416654359. eCollection 2016 Aug.
10
Lifestyle intervention might easily improve blood pressure in hypertensive men with the C genotype of angiotensin II type 2 receptor gene.生活方式干预可能很容易改善携带血管紧张素II 2型受体基因C基因型的高血压男性的血压。
Nutr Res Pract. 2015 Aug;9(4):385-92. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2015.9.4.385. Epub 2015 Jun 19.